These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6954847)

  • 1. Utility and efficiency of linked marker genes for genetic counseling. II. Identification of linkage phase by offspring phenotypes.
    Chakravarti A; Nei M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1982 Jul; 34(4):531-51. PubMed ID: 6954847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utility and efficiency of linked marker genes for genetic counseling. III. Proportion of informative families under linkage disequilibrium.
    Chakravarti A
    Am J Hum Genet; 1983 Jul; 35(4):592-610. PubMed ID: 6576632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of linkage phase by parental phenotypes.
    Axenovich TI
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(3):271-83. PubMed ID: 8797009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting linkage for genetically heterogeneous diseases and detecting heterogeneity with linkage data.
    Cavalli-Sforza LL; King MC
    Am J Hum Genet; 1986 May; 38(5):599-616. PubMed ID: 3459352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of restriction fragment length polymorphisms for genetic counseling: population genetic considerations.
    Asmussen MA; Clegg MT
    Am J Hum Genet; 1982 May; 34(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 6282118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiallelic restriction fragment polymorphisms in genetic counseling: population genetic considerations.
    Asmussen MA; Clegg MT
    Hum Hered; 1985; 35(3):129-42. PubMed ID: 3858219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of incompletely linked markers in genetic counseling: accuracy versus linkage.
    Asmussen MA
    Hum Hered; 1985; 35(2):73-88. PubMed ID: 3857217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The detection of linkage and heterogeneity in nuclear families for complex disorders: one versus two marker loci.
    Martinez MM; Goldin LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 1989 Apr; 44(4):552-9. PubMed ID: 2929598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of multiple restriction fragment length polymorphisms in prenatal risk estimation. I. X-linked diseases.
    Clark AG
    Am J Hum Genet; 1985 Jan; 37(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 2983545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linkage study in families with posterior helical ear pits and Wiedemann-Beckwith syndrome.
    Barr CL; Best L; Weksberg R
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 104(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 11746041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategies and sample-size considerations for mapping a two-locus autosomal recessive disorder.
    Majumder PP
    Am J Hum Genet; 1989 Sep; 45(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 2773934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linked polymorphic DNA markers in the prediction of X-linked muscular dystrophy.
    Lindlöf M; Sistonen P; de la Chapelle A
    Ann Hum Genet; 1987 Oct; 51(4):317-28. PubMed ID: 3482147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retinitis pigmentosa: genetic mapping in X-linked and autosomal forms of the disease.
    Humphries P; Farrar GJ; Kenna P; McWilliam P
    Clin Genet; 1990 Jul; 38(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 2201466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Definitive evidence for an autosomal recessive form of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia clinically indistinguishable from the more common X-linked disorder.
    Munoz F; Lestringant G; Sybert V; Frydman M; Alswaini A; Frossard PM; Jorgenson R; Zonana J
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Jul; 61(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 9245989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Point estimation and graphical inference of marginal dominance for two viability loci controlling inbreeding depression.
    Fu YB; Charlesworth D; Namkoong G
    Genet Res; 1997 Oct; 70(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 9449191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Segregation analysis incorporating linkage markers. I. Single-locus models with an application to type I diabetes.
    Risch N
    Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Mar; 36(2):363-86. PubMed ID: 6608876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample-size considerations and strategies for linkage analysis in autosomal recessive disorders.
    Wong FL; Cantor RM; Rotter JI
    Am J Hum Genet; 1986 Jul; 39(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 3019130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-trait-locus linkage analysis: a powerful strategy for mapping complex genetic traits.
    Schork NJ; Boehnke M; Terwilliger JD; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Nov; 53(5):1127-36. PubMed ID: 8213836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the heredity of retinitis pigmentosa.
    Jay M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1982 Jul; 66(7):405-16. PubMed ID: 7093178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Establishing a gene linkage phase by parental phenotype].
    Aksenovich TI
    Genetika; 1995 Aug; 31(8):1168-76. PubMed ID: 7590224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.