These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6956395)
21. California Blue Cross redirects incentive dollars from UM to quality. Capitation Manag Rep; 2001 Sep; 8(9):140-2, 129. PubMed ID: 11577503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The National Health Service in the United Kingdom: model for the United States? Butler E J Med Assoc Ga; 1993 Dec; 82(12):643-5. PubMed ID: 8035139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A balanced approach to managed care. Avellone JC; Euele MA Group Pract J; 1987; 36(2):60-2. PubMed ID: 10281292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Business and industry's role - a working partnership with providers. Carpenter RA J Fla Med Assoc; 1982 Mar; 69(3):198-201. PubMed ID: 7077281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Health care reform, the American way. Nugent JT J Med Assoc Ga; 1993 Dec; 82(12):674. PubMed ID: 8035146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Perspectives. Drug utilization review: apocalypse when? Ault A Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1992 Feb; 46(8):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10116064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Utilization analysis and physician profiling--new paradigm, old paradigm. Caper P Surg Endosc; 1995 Nov; 9(11):1216-9. PubMed ID: 8553240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Private utilization review and quality assurance. Stamm JB Bull N Y Acad Med; 1987; 63(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 3103802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Hospital utilization review--an essential element in health care cost containment. Handel B Empl Benefits J; 1984 Sep; 9(3):8-12, 30. PubMed ID: 10273548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Insurance companies to intensify claims review. Interview by Dona De Sanctis. Schramm CJ Hospitals; 1988 Dec; 62(23):58-9. PubMed ID: 3181939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Putting the clinical appropriateness factor in utilization management. Steen P Ambul Outreach; 1998; ():20-2. PubMed ID: 10346581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The health plan challenge. Watching to see if industry rhetoric on quality, costs is backed by action. Sloane T Mod Healthc; 2004 Apr; 34(15):20. PubMed ID: 15124417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. All together now. Kosterlitz J Natl J (Wash); 1993 Nov; 25(46):2704-8. PubMed ID: 10130066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cost controls must not damage quality. Batchlor E; Hayling C West J Med; 1999 Jun; 170(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 10443170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Quality in managed care: developments and considerations. Spoeri RK Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1997; 5(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 10169183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Managed care: good or bad news for children? Jellinek MS J Dev Behav Pediatr; 1994 Aug; 15(4):273-4. PubMed ID: 7798373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Designing a guideline-based utilization management program. Wilson AS; Scheibner IH; Winslow CM Benefits Q; 1991; 7(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 10116956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]