123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6956723)
1. Use of a previously completed prosthesis in the construction of a new orbital prosthesis.
Kent K; Schaaf NG
J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Sep; 48(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 6956723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Simplified fabrication of orbital prostheses using posterior attachment for the artificial eye.
Shifman A
J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Jan; 69(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 8455172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modified bar superstructure for an implant-retained orbital prosthesis.
Khan Z; Bowden M; Beam D
J Prosthodont; 1994 Jun; 3(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 9227099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orbital prostheses.
Joneja OP; Madan SK; Mehra MD; Dogra RN
J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Sep; 36(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 1066484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Plastic eye implant.
RUEDEMANN AD
Am J Ophthalmol; 1946 Aug; 29():947-52. PubMed ID: 20994634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated orbital implants.
Perry AC
Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1990; 8():75-81. PubMed ID: 2174242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Construction of orbital prostheses using the silicone pattern technique.
Oral K; Zini I; Aramany MA
J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Oct; 40(4):430-3. PubMed ID: 279692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A new type of ocular prosthesis.
SCOTT RB
AMA Arch Ophthalmol; 1956 May; 55(5):694-8. PubMed ID: 13312769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Anatomical and mechanical retention in maxillofacial prosthetics.
Cortes AL; Funk JJ
Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1994 Nov; 11(9):33-7. PubMed ID: 7491473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. REHABILITATION OF THE ORBIT AFTER EXENTERATION FOR MALIGNANCY.
WAINSTOCK MA; METZ HH
J Int Coll Surg; 1965 Sep; 44():289-97. PubMed ID: 14334887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Methacrylic resin implant for sunken upper lid following enucleation.
SUGAR HS; FORESTNER HJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 1946 Aug; 29():993-1000. PubMed ID: 20994640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone-anchored craniofacial prosthesis study.
Tolman DE; Taylor PF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 8666446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Orbital volume augmentation with adjustable prefabricated methylmethacrylate subperiosteal implants.
Dresner SC; Codère F; Corriveau C
Ophthalmic Surg; 1991 Jan; 22(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 2014113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Implant anchorage possibilities for defect prostheses and replacements].
Laass M; Retemeyer K; Lange KP; Thierfelder C; Kalz W; Kirsch A; Neuendorf G; Duncan GF
Quintessenz; 1991 Nov; 42(11):1725-35. PubMed ID: 1819059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A mold technique for orbital prostheses.
Jooste C; Bester D; Roets R
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):380-2. PubMed ID: 1507106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prosthesis fitting following autogenous dermis-fat orbital implantation: an ocularist's view.
Gougelmann HP
Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1990; 8():182-3. PubMed ID: 2248709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Orbito-prosthesis post orbital exenteration. The first case report in Thailand.
Prachakvej P; Nantawan P; Siddhiphongse B
J Med Assoc Thai; 1971 Aug; 54(8):593-7. PubMed ID: 5158777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of a surgical positioner for bone-anchored facial prostheses.
Reisberg DJ; Habakuk SW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):376-9. PubMed ID: 9197103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An improved procedure in prosthesis plastic surgery.
ABRAHAM SV; ZUGSMITH G
Am J Ophthalmol; 1947 May; 30(5):618. PubMed ID: 20241725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Prosthetic rehabilitation of the anophthalmic socket using osseointegrated fixtures.
Bowden M
Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1992; 9():299-301. PubMed ID: 1457067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]