These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6956823)

  • 1. A comparative study of wire osteosynthesis versus bone screws in the treatment of mandibular prognathism.
    Paulus GW; Steinhauser EW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Jul; 54(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 6956823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Effect of different forms of osteosynthesis on the temporomandibular joint in the correction of mandibular prognathism].
    Paulus GW
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1983 Jul; 38(7):717-21. PubMed ID: 6578020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Sensitivity disorders after ramus osteotomies using wire and traction screw osteosynthesis].
    Paulus GW
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1983 Jun; 38(6):633-7. PubMed ID: 6576900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of mandibular stability after sagittal split osteotomies: biocortical versus monocortical osteosynthesis.
    Fujioka M; Fujii T; Hirano A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Nov; 37(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 11108524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The stability of mandibular prognathism corrected by bilateral sagittal split osteotomies: a comparison of bi-cortical osteosynthesis and mono-cortical osteosynthesis.
    Hsu SS; Huang CS; Chen PK; Ko EW; Chen YR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 22129998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The results of sagittal mandibular splitting with traction screw osteosynthesis in the surgical correction of progenia].
    Härtel J
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1989; 77(8):807-10. PubMed ID: 2534015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sagittal ramus osteotomy with tandem screw fixation. Technique and results.
    Lindorf HH
    J Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Dec; 14(6):311-6. PubMed ID: 3466998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback.
    Proffit WR; Phillips C; Dann C; Turvey TA
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 1940541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term neurosensory deficits following transoral vertical ramus and sagittal split osteotomies for mandibular prognathism.
    Zaytoun HS; Phillips C; Terry BC
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Mar; 44(3):193-6. PubMed ID: 3456440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lag screw versus wire osteosynthesis in mandibular advancement.
    Mommaerts MY
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 1812180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computerized tomography examination for the detection of positional changes in the temporomandibular joint after ramus osteotomies with screw fixation.
    Spitzer W; Rettinger G; Sitzmann F
    J Maxillofac Surg; 1984 Jun; 12(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 6589344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New techniques for reproduction of the condyle relation and reduction of complications after sagittal ramus split osteotomy of the mandible.
    Raveh J; Vuillemin T; Lädrach K; Sutter F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1988 Sep; 46(9):751-7. PubMed ID: 3166045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of relapse in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies for mandibular advancement: rigid internal fixation (screws) versus inferior border wiring with anterior skeletal fixation.
    Moenning JE; Bussard DA; Lapp TH; Garrison BT
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1990; 5(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 2098453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Function of the masticatory system in 20 patients with mandibular hypo- or hyperplasia after correction by a sagittal split osteotomy.
    Magnusson T; Ahlborg G; Svartz K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1990 Oct; 19(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 2124601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
    Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of buccal cortex as interpositional graft in mandibular setbacks.
    Elledge R; Chandegra R; Stockton P
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 55(8):853-854. PubMed ID: 28818503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sagittal split advancement osteotomies stabilized with miniplates. A 2-5-year follow-up.
    Scheerlinck JP; Stoelinga PJ; Blijdorp PA; Brouns JJ; Nijs ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1994 Jun; 23(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 7930763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Transjugal osteosynthesis by compression miniscrew in sagittal ramus osteotomy].
    Boutault F; Fabie M; Cadenat H; Baro JP
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1987; 88(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 3479829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rigid fixation of intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Fujimura K; Bessho K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1170-3. PubMed ID: 21802187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.