These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6957831)

  • 21. A comparison of rectangular and cylindrical collimation for intraoral radiographs.
    Horton PS; Sippy FH; Nelson JF; Kohout FJ; Kienzle GC
    J Dent Educ; 1983 Dec; 47(12):771-3. PubMed ID: 6582105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
    Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of tube potential setting and dose on the visibility of lesions in intraoral radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 17403883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Rectangular or circular x-ray cones for intraoral radiography?].
    Eliasson S; Fjellstrom CA
    Tandlakartidningen; 1982 Jan; 74(1-2):12-7. PubMed ID: 6954706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic imaging assessment of experimental intraoral "folded film".
    Ludlow JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jul; 64(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 3475649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Seven ways to achieve quality full-mouth surveys.
    Gomolka KA
    CDS Rev; 2000 Apr; 93(3):34-5. PubMed ID: 11276523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Xeroradiography of dental structures. I. Preliminary investigations.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Parks CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1977 Jul; 44(1):148-52. PubMed ID: 267873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Imaging properties of intraoral dental xeroradiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Sickles EA; Jeromin LS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Nov; 99(5):805-9. PubMed ID: 290676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Mouyen F; Benz C; Sonnabend E; Lodter JP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 2780024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative means of dose reduction in dental radiography.
    Rohlin M; White SC
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():1-9. PubMed ID: 1520917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of image quality on radiographic diagnosis of approximal caries.
    Svenson B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 74():1-62. PubMed ID: 2035145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rare earth filters for intraoral radiography: exposure reduction as a function of kV(p) with comparisons of image quality.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 May; 118(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 2715547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical study of the sensitivity and dynamic range of three digital systems, E-speed film and digitized film.
    Bóscolo FN; Oliveira AE; Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11696917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An old/new idea for reducing exposure to x-rays.
    Colquitt WN; Richards AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Nov; 54(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 6960314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A device for the reduction of population dose.
    Kihara T; Uchinoumi K; Akagi F; Antoku S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Jun; 53(6):642-6. PubMed ID: 6954447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mail survey of dental radiographic techniques and radiation doses in Greece.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Tsiklakis K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 10895629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimal parameters for lateral oblique radiographs of rat mandibles.
    Mahl CR; Fontanella V
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 18460576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of D- and E-speed intraoral film.
    Kaugars GE; Harmon FJ; Kaugars CC
    Gen Dent; 1984; 32(4):316-7. PubMed ID: 6590413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Clinical evaluation of intensifying screens and films for intraoral radiography].
    Okano T; Yoda E
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Mar; 50(1):155. PubMed ID: 6577111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.