These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6958324)

  • 1. Canine retraction with the edgewise appliance-some problems and solutions.
    Charles CR; Jones ML
    Br J Orthod; 1982 Oct; 9(4):194-202. PubMed ID: 6958324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retraction of canines with axial control using extra-oral traction.
    Davis HD; Usiskin LA
    Br J Orthod; 1981 Jan; 8(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 6944102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Begg-edgewise diagnosis-determined totally individualized orthodontic technique: foundations, description, and rationale.
    Hocevar RA
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 88(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 3860011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Canine retraction with J hook headgear.
    Ayala Perez C; de Alba JA; Caputo AA; Chaconas SJ
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Nov; 78(5):538-47. PubMed ID: 6933859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal loading conditions for controlled movement of anterior teeth in sliding mechanics.
    Tominaga JY; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Gonzales C; Kobayashi M; Yoshida N
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1102-7. PubMed ID: 19852600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical evaluation of tooth movement along arch wires of two different sizes.
    Huffman DJ; Way DC
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Jun; 83(6):453-9. PubMed ID: 6574702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of different sectional arches in canine retraction.
    Dinçer M; Işcan HN
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 16(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 7957657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
    Kojima Y; Fukui H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
    Xu TM; Zhang X; Oh HS; Boyd RL; Korn EL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Canine retraction: a comparison of two preadjusted bracket systems.
    Lotzof LP; Fine HA; Cisneros GJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Aug; 110(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 8760846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Anchorage and edgewise therapy].
    Garcia R
    Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1985 Apr; 19(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 3865324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distal movement without headgear: the use of an upper removable appliance for the retraction of upper first molars.
    Mordecai RM
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):343-4. PubMed ID: 9459038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Upper headgear versus lower headgear, yokes, and class III elastics.
    Osvaldik-Trapl M; Droschl H
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 272132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retraction of canines using bonded tube-brackets.
    Davis HD
    Br J Orthod; 1983 Oct; 10(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 6357274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simple sectional canine retraction technique using the properties of nickel titanium rectangular wire.
    Orton HS; McDonald F
    Eur J Orthod; 1985 May; 7(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 3894039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.