These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6959671)

  • 1. [Deformation studies of an embalmed human mandible in the wet state and an implant blade under static loading].
    Shimada J; Koh T; Yamamoto Y; Sumida H; Hasuike T; Niikura K; Yagiu Y
    Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1981; 10(3):413-21. PubMed ID: 6959671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomathematical study on implant design and stress distribution.
    Kitoh M; Suetsugu T; Murakami Y; Tabata T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1978 Dec; 25(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 282021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress analysis of blade implant--mechanical properties of implant materials and stress distribution.
    Suetsugu T; Kitoh M; Murakami Y
    J Oral Implantol; 1979; 8(3):380-92. PubMed ID: 297794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional finite element analysis of a blade implant.
    Ismail YH; Pahountis LN; Fleming JF
    Int J Oral Implantol; 1987; 4(2):25-31. PubMed ID: 3269833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Histologic studies of endosseous blade-vent implants of a human mandible: report of an autopsy case.
    Schneider P; Makek M; Feigel A; Ochsenbein H; Lutz F; Mühlemann HR
    J Oral Implantol; 1978; 8(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 290836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Histological study of an endosseous blade implant in the human mandible. A case report].
    Schneider PE
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Nov; 89(11):1139-40. PubMed ID: 293908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomical considerations when using endodontic endosseous pins and blade implants.
    Barker BC
    Implantologist; 1978 Aug; 1(3):87-101. PubMed ID: 290560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dynamic adhesion loading of the IK-blade implant and examination of adhesion compression].
    Tham R; Meyer H; Kanth L
    ZWR; 1983 Jul; 92(7):52-3. PubMed ID: 6586032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Elastic tension measurement by static loading of implant structures in cadaver mandibles].
    Reimann P
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Nov; 89(11):1141-2. PubMed ID: 293909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The endosseous blade implant: a post-operative perspective.
    Druck JS
    Ont Dent; 1981 Sep; 58(9):8, 10-1. PubMed ID: 6949109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical analysis of Linkow blade vent implants.
    Dahl GS
    J Oral Implantol; 1983; 11(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 6368847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biological engineering and implantology.
    Wimmer J
    J Oral Implantol; 1987; 13(2):254-61. PubMed ID: 3268685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An experimental study on the tissue compatibility of the titanium blade-vent implant coated with HAP-alumina in the semi-functional state.
    Morimoto K; Kihara A; Takeshita F; Suetsugu T; Tanaka J; Tsunosue U
    J Oral Implantol; 1987; 13(3):387-401. PubMed ID: 2855647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The titanalloy endosseous implant.
    Hahn J
    Implantologist; 1981; 2(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 6955273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. I. Histological aspects.
    Brunski JB; Moccia AF; Pollack SR; Korostoff E; Trachtenberg DI
    J Dent Res; 1979 Oct; 58(10):1953-69. PubMed ID: 291620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Review of oral rehabilitation with the Linkow blade implant in private practice over a 6-year period].
    Wesche A
    Quintessenz; 1981 Feb; 32(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 7043553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT.
    Liao SH; Tong RF; Dong JX
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jan; 32(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17951028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant prostheses. Blade vs. cantilever--clinical trial.
    Schnitman P; Rubenstein JE; Jeffcoat MK; Bertolami CN; Koch GC; Shulman LB
    J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(3):449-59. PubMed ID: 3550114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between endosteal implant design and function: maximum stress distribution with computer-formed, three dimensional Flexi-Cup blades.
    Valen M
    J Oral Implantol; 1983; 11(1):49-71. PubMed ID: 6368845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.