These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6960314)

  • 1. An old/new idea for reducing exposure to x-rays.
    Colquitt WN; Richards AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Nov; 54(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 6960314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variations in film exposure, effective kVp, and HVL among thirty-five dental x-ray units.
    Preece JW; Jensen CW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Dec; 56(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 6581465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiological characteristics of lead foils in dental film packets: analysis of components and shielding effect.
    Araki K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 1397446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristic curves of dental x-ray film.
    Havukainen R; Servomaa A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jul; 62(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 3460001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films.
    Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The optimum circular field size for dental radiography with intraoral films.
    van Straaten FJ; van Aken J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Sep; 54(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 6957831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods for reducing patient exposure combined with Kodak Ektaspeed dental x-ray film.
    Silha RE
    Dent Radiogr Photogr; 1981; 54(4):80-7. PubMed ID: 6949795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the sensitometric properties of dental X-ray films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 126(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 7897103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two dental x-ray films compared for rater preference using endodontic views.
    Kleier DJ; Benner SJ; Averbach RE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Feb; 59(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 3885130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [X-ray image detectors in stomatology].
    Gorelik FG
    Med Tekh; 1998; (6):17-9. PubMed ID: 9949983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
    Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental radiographic exposure normalization program (DENT). The experience in Nassau County, NY.
    Goren AD; Sciubba JJ; Moskowitz GW; Mehta S; Theesfeld RL
    N Y State Dent J; 1993; 59(7):49-51. PubMed ID: 8371883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exposure reduction using Ektaspeed film.
    Howard ML; Stocks HS
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1982; 61(4):37-8. PubMed ID: 6958760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Structure of medical X-ray films].
    Okano T; Kikuchi A
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Mar; 28(1 Pt 1):195-202. PubMed ID: 2135104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic imaging assessment of experimental intraoral "folded film".
    Ludlow JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jul; 64(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 3475649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
    Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduction in dental X-ray exposures during the past 60 years.
    Richards AG; Colquitt WN
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1981 Nov; 103(5):713-8. PubMed ID: 6946136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.