These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6960514)
1. [The information obtained from an intraoral radiograph is dependent on the conditions under which it is examined]. Sewerin I; Andersen HE Tandlaegebladet; 1982 Aug; 86(13):428-32. PubMed ID: 6960514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Rectangular or circular x-ray cones for intraoral radiography?]. Eliasson S; Fjellstrom CA Tandlakartidningen; 1982 Jan; 74(1-2):12-7. PubMed ID: 6954706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of D- and E-speed intraoral film. Kaugars GE; Harmon FJ; Kaugars CC Gen Dent; 1984; 32(4):316-7. PubMed ID: 6590413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A densitometric evaluation of two radiographic duplicating films under differing conditions of exposure and processing. Price C Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Aug; 50(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 6930620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flash Dent: an alternative charge-coupled device/scintillator-based direct digital intraoral radiographic system. Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Kelly MS Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8181653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lead foil in the intraoral periapical radiograph as an inclusion agent: a simple method in denture identification. Shamim T J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Feb; 22(2):130-1. PubMed ID: 22313659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of rectangular and cylindrical collimation for intraoral radiographs. Horton PS; Sippy FH; Nelson JF; Kohout FJ; Kienzle GC J Dent Educ; 1983 Dec; 47(12):771-3. PubMed ID: 6582105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of viewing conditions on the perceptibility of radiographic details. Welander U; McDavid WD; Higgins NM; Morris CR Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Dec; 56(6):651-4. PubMed ID: 6581464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Dental radioscopy with an image intensifier]. Bertreux P; Salaun M Ligament; 1980; (136):71-3. PubMed ID: 6936584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of a rotating radiographic anode tube on picture quality]. Homberg R Zahnarztl Prax; 1984 Nov; 35(11):439-40. PubMed ID: 6596817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics]. Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does a narrow tubular collimator produce better dental radiographs? Hedin M; Halse A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1981; 10(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 6949844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [From conventional to numeric. Treatment of digitalized radiographic images--modifications--improvements]. Daudibertieres L; Etienne G; Cattoen M Inf Dent; 1991 Mar; 73(13):931-44. PubMed ID: 2071192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The color equidensitmetry of dental radiographs by means of Technifax-DZO-Diafilm (I)]. Schienbein H Quintessenz; 1978 Aug; 29(8):81-4. PubMed ID: 284433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]