These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6960536)
1. [Use of filmholders to obtain reproducible bite-wing films for the diagnosis of caries]. Kirkegaard E; Sewerin I Tandlaegebladet; 1982 May; 86(9):297-302. PubMed ID: 6960536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical and diagnostic comparison of 2 intraoral radiographic films]. Wenzel A Tandlaegebladet; 1983 Jun; 87(11):397-9. PubMed ID: 6581551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the visibility of caries on Kodak F-speed (insight) and D-speed (Ultra-speed) films. Thunthy KH; Ireland EJ LDA J; 2001; 60(2):31-2. PubMed ID: 11476026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of a new processor containing a self-cleaning synthetic-web transport mechanism. Svenson B; Petersson A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 8508937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of orthopantomographs and dental films in the diagnosis of interdental caries and apical osteitis]. Grasser H; Barth HH Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1987 Sep; 42(9):818-21. PubMed ID: 3483781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of a new dental X-ray film, Agfa Gevaert Dentus M4, with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental X-ray films. Svenson B; Lindvall AM; Gröndahl HG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8508944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Connection among film position, shadows on bite wing radiographs, clinical low value and histological size of proximal lesions (2)]. Benn DK; Watson TF Quintessenz; 1989 Jun; 40(6):1107-15. PubMed ID: 2813707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Connection among film position, shadows on bite wing radiographs, clinical low value and histological size of proximal lesions (1)]. Benn DK; Watson TF Quintessenz; 1989 May; 40(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 2813696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The role of x-ray films in diagnosis in operative dentistry]. Sonnabend E Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Nov; 45(11):691-5. PubMed ID: 2269082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Interpretation of bite-wing radiographs in restorative dentistry]. Zanirato G Dent Cadmos; 1988 Mar; 56(5):56-61. PubMed ID: 3267560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reproducibility in bite-wing radiographs. A comparison of Eggen-Bite and Kwik-Bite]. Møystad A; Larheim TA Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1987 Feb; 97(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 3473432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Requirements for supplemental periapical radiographs following No. 0 and No. 2 bite-wings. Myers DR; Barenie JT; Bell RA Pediatr Dent; 1984 Dec; 6(4):235-7. PubMed ID: 6596572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between film position, bite-wing shadows, clinical pitfalls, and the histologic size of approximal lesions. Benn DK; Watson TF Quintessence Int; 1989 Feb; 20(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 2762503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Survey of bite-wing entrance surface exposures for dental X-ray generators. Holloway AF; McFarlane DJ Ont Dent; 1984 Feb; 61(2):23-6, 29. PubMed ID: 6591105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Examination with a cold-light diagnostic probe. An alternative to serial bitewing films?]. Pieper K; Schurade B Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1987 Oct; 42(10):900-3. PubMed ID: 3483686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of different developing solutions and developing times on radiographic caries diagnosis. Svenson B; Petersson A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Nov; 19(4):157-60. PubMed ID: 2097224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Kodak D-speed and E-speed x-ray film in detection of proximal caries. Waggoner WF; Ashton JJ ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 3198837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]