These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6960712)

  • 1. Relation of the SNA angle to the NSAr angle in excellent occlusion and in malocclusion.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Mar; 81(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 6960712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Saddle angle and maxillary prognathism: a radiological analysis of the association between the NSAr and SNA angles.
    Järvinen S
    Br J Orthod; 1984 Oct; 11(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 6594162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relation of the SNA angle to the saddle angle.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Dec; 78(6):670-3. PubMed ID: 6935966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Facial prognathism and its relation to the cranial base in Brazilian children with Class I malocclusion].
    Mestriner Júnior W; Valente A
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 2639454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The occlusal plane in Class I and Class II malocclusion: its relation to craniofacial variables].
    Kuntz M; Turlot JC; Hildwein M
    Orthod Fr; 1988; 59 Pt 2():383-93. PubMed ID: 3078360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cephalometric comparison between Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion in adults.
    Fischer-Brandies H; Fischer-Brandies E; König A
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 3860257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in dentofacial morphology and occlusion in juvenile idiopathic arthritis subjects: a case-control study.
    Hu Y; Billiau AD; Verdonck A; Wouters C; Carels C
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 19164412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of anterior and posterior occlusal planes with different Angle and skeletal classes in permanent dentitions : A lateral cephalometric radiograph study.
    Čelar A; Tafaj E; Graf A; Lettner S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jul; 79(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 29777251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integration of certain facial skeletal variants in the determination of facial morphology.
    Seshadri B
    J Indian Orthod Soc; 1977; 9(2):21-38. PubMed ID: 296293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Hard and soft tissue profile changes and their relation to the maxillary protrusion of adult females treated with the Begg technic].
    Machida M
    Shigaku; 1984 Apr; 71(6):1036-62. PubMed ID: 6591080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Assessment of Facial Asymmetry in Malocclusion using Posteroanterior View.
    Sahu A; Lall R; Nezam S; Singh R; Kumar SB; Ayub FB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):712-718. PubMed ID: 29959301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Craniofacial characteristics of subjects with normal and postnormal occlusions--a longitudinal study.
    Kerr WJ; Hirst D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Sep; 92(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 3477087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationships between changes in skeletal and integumental points A and B following orthodontic treatment.
    LaMastra SJ
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Apr; 79(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 6939334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Skeletal pathology and Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion. A study of 300 patients].
    Aknin JJ; Laumon B
    Orthod Fr; 1986; 57 Pt 2():741-55. PubMed ID: 3077159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the relevance of "ideal" occlusion concepts for incisor inclination target definition.
    Knösel M; Jung K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 22051485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of functional versus bisected occlusal planes on the Wits appraisal.
    Thayer TA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 2333856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the interaction between incisor crown-root morphology and third-order angulation.
    Knösel M; Jung K; Attin T; Engelke W; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Gripp-Rudolph L; Attin R
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):454-61. PubMed ID: 19413389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multivariate approach to analyzing the relation between occlusion and craniofacial morphology.
    Keeling SD; Riolo ML; Martin RE; Ten Have TR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Apr; 95(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 2705410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.