These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6960718)
21. The reliability and validity of measurements of human dental casts made by an intra-oral 3D scanner, with conventional hand-held digital callipers as the comparison measure. Rajshekar M; Julian R; Williams AM; Tennant M; Forrest A; Walsh LJ; Wilson G; Blizzard L Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():198-204. PubMed ID: 28738248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optical measurement of dental cast profile and application to analysis of three-dimensional tooth movement in orthodontics. Yamamoto K; Toshimitsu A; Mikami T; Hayashi S; Harada R; Nakamura S Front Med Biol Eng; 1989; 1(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 2486752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Efficiency of noncompliance simultaneous first and second upper molar distalization: a three-dimensional tooth movement analysis. Mavropoulos A; Karamouzos A; Kiliaridis S; Papadopoulos MA Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):532-9. PubMed ID: 16097221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Natural craniofacial changes in the third decade of life: a longitudinal study. Akgül AA; Toygar TU Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):512-22. PubMed ID: 12439480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Which method to measure dentomaxillary discrepancy? Regragui S; Dakka A; Regragui F; Bouklouz A; Zaoui F Int Orthod; 2010 Mar; 8(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 20350717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of orthodontic force and tooth movement measurements. Lundgren D; Owman-Moll P; Kurol J; Mårtensson B Br J Orthod; 1996 Aug; 23(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 8894157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An examination of dental crowding and its relationship to tooth size and arch dimension. Howe RP; McNamara JA; O'Connor KA Am J Orthod; 1983 May; 83(5):363-73. PubMed ID: 6573844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relations between tooth positions and focal troughs of panoramic machines. Lund TM; Manson-Hing LR Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1975 Aug; 40(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 1057153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Tooth size and arch dimension in uncrowded versus crowded Class I malocclusions. Poosti M; Jalali T J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):45-52. PubMed ID: 17351681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Patterning of human dental arch wire blanks using a vector quantization algorithm. Fujita K; Takada K; QianRong G; Shibata T Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 12169027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Three-dimensional monitoring of root movement during orthodontic treatment. Lee RJ; Weissheimer A; Pham J; Go L; de Menezes LM; Redmond WR; Loos JF; Sameshima GT; Tong H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 25533080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A technique for evaluation of centric relation tooth contacts. Part I: During normal temporomandibular joint function. Capp NJ; Clayton JA J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 3862815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts. de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of distances between the mandibular teeth and the alveolar process in Brazilians with normal occlusion. Triviño T; Siqueira DF; Andrews WA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):308.e1-4; discussion 308-9. PubMed ID: 20197165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A critical comparison of three methods for measuring dental models. Rossouw PE; Benatar M; Stander I; Wynchank S J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 Apr; 46(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 1962313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models. El-Zanaty HM; El-Beialy AR; Abou El-Ezz AM; Attia KH; El-Bialy AR; Mostafa YA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Maximum Intercuspal Contacts of Articulated Casts and Virtual Casts Requiring Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures. Arslan Y; Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S; Kökdoğan Boyacı B; Aydın C J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):594-598. PubMed ID: 26848940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Zilberman O; Huggare JA; Parikakis KA Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of dental and basal arch forms using cone-beam CT and 3D virtual models of normal occlusion. Bayome M; Park JH; Han SH; Baek SH; Sameshima GT; Kook YA Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 23785937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]