These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6960721)

  • 61. [Clinical importance of bite registration in treating Angle class II with a functional regulator].
    Falck F
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1987; 75(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 2956796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Anterior vertical changes in function regulator therapy.
    Haynes S
    Eur J Orthod; 1983 Aug; 5(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 6578044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible.
    Nanda RS; Merrill RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Apr; 105(4):328-44. PubMed ID: 8154458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. A study in human subjects using a new device designed to mimic the protrusive functional appliances used previously in monkeys.
    DeVincenzo JP; Huffer RA; Winn MW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Mar; 91(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 3103423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on the mandibular position.
    Yamaguchi K; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Nov; 100(5):443-52. PubMed ID: 1951197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Cephalometric changes during headgear-reactivator treatment.
    Remmelink HJ; Tan BG
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Dec; 13(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 1817072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The mandibular plane angle in activator treatment.
    Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 1979 Jan; 49(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 283705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Use of activator appliances in pediatric patients treated with costochondral grafts for temporomandibular joint ankylosis: analysis of 13 cases.
    Behnia H; Motamedi MH; Tehranchi A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Dec; 55(12):1408-14; discussion 1414-6. PubMed ID: 9393400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues.
    Illing HM; Morris DO; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):501-16. PubMed ID: 9825553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The validity of superimposing oblique cephalometric radiographs to assess tooth movement: an implant study.
    Sakima MT; Sakima CG; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 15356499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Mandibular response to orthodontic treatment with the Bionator appliance.
    Mamandras AH; Allen LP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 2301298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions.
    Wieslander L; Lagerström L
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Jan; 75(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 283692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The activator: its scope and limitation in general dental practice.
    Taylor GS
    Br Dent J; 1980 Sep; 149(5):127-32. PubMed ID: 6932889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Deep bite treatment in relation to mandibular growth rotation.
    Levin RI
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Apr; 13(2):86-94. PubMed ID: 2055257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric study.
    Hansen K; Pancherz H
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Aug; 14(4):285-95. PubMed ID: 1516661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Dentoalveolar compensation related to variations in sagittal jaw relationships.
    Ishikawa H; Nakamura S; Iwasaki H; Kitazawa S; Tsukada H; Sato Y
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Dec; 69(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 10593444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Effects of cervical anchorage during and after treatment: an implant study.
    Melsen B
    Am J Orthod; 1978 May; 73(5):526-40. PubMed ID: 277067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Insights into occlusal problems through the use of centric relation procedures. Part two.
    Carlson GL
    Northwest Dent; 2007; 86(2):31-4, 37, 39 passim. PubMed ID: 17479703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.