These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6960732)

  • 1. The CV value (combined variation) in the analysis of sagittal malocclusions.
    Luzi V
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Jun; 81(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 6960732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relation of the SNA angle to the saddle angle.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Dec; 78(6):670-3. PubMed ID: 6935966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Facial prognathism and its relation to the cranial base in Brazilian children with Class I malocclusion].
    Mestriner Júnior W; Valente A
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 2639454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Saddle angle and maxillary prognathism: a radiological analysis of the association between the NSAr and SNA angles.
    Järvinen S
    Br J Orthod; 1984 Oct; 11(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 6594162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlations among craniofacial angles and dimensions in Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Anderson D; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2923320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The JYD angle: a modified method of establishing sagittal apical base relationship.
    Järvinen S
    Eur J Orthod; 1982 Nov; 4(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 6959814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relation of the SNA angle to the NSAr angle in excellent occlusion and in malocclusion.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Mar; 81(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 6960712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variation in morphology of the maxillary central incisors found in class II, division 2 malocclusions.
    Delivanis HP; Kuftinec MM
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Oct; 78(4):438-43. PubMed ID: 6933852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The nasopharynx, face height, and overbite.
    Kerr WJ
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Jan; 55(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 3856405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overbite and face height in 44 male subjects with class I, class II/1 and class II/2 occlusion.
    Adams CP; Kerr WJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 6941889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study.
    Siriwat PP; Jarabak JR
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Apr; 55(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 3874569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of two angular and two linear measurements used to establish sagittal apical base relationship.
    Järvinen S
    Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 6941890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial variations related to headform type.
    Bhat M; Enlow DH
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):269-80. PubMed ID: 3865565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 7942657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. A cephalometric consideration of changes in the inter-incisal angle and soft tissue profile.
    Keating PJ
    Br J Orthod; 1986 Oct; 13(4):209-20. PubMed ID: 3465369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental age assessment in orthodontic patients with and without skeletal malocclusions.
    Celikoglu M; Erdem A; Dane A; Demirci T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 May; 14(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 21457454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of 15 year old children with excellent occlusion and with crowding of the teeth, Angle Class I malocclusion, in respect of face size and shape and tooth size.
    Adams CP
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():11-26. PubMed ID: 6963765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.