These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6960861)

  • 1. Reaction of rat connective tissue to gutta-percha and silver points. A long-term histological study.
    Holland R; de Souza V; Nery MJ; de Mello W; Bernabé PF; Otoboni JA
    Aust Dent J; 1982 Aug; 27(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 6960861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaction of rat connective tissue to some gutta-percha formulations.
    Wolfson EM; Seltzer S
    J Endod; 1975 Dec; 1(12):395-402. PubMed ID: 1062489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of tissue response between a synthetic gutta-percha and a natural gutta-percha endodontic filler.
    Nicholson RJ; Casanova F; Greenspan J; Stark MM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1975 May; 39(5):802-5. PubMed ID: 1056582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subcutaneous implantation for the biological evaluation of endodontic materials.
    Olsson B; Sliwkowski A; Langeland K
    J Endod; 1981 Aug; 7(8):355-67. PubMed ID: 7021745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reaction of rat connective tissue to polyethylene tube implants filled with Hydron or gutta-percha.
    Tanzilli JP; Nevins AJ; Borden BG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 May; 55(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 6575341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biocompatibility of a self-adhesive gutta-percha-based material in subcutaneous tissue of mice.
    Belladonna FG; Calasans-Maia MD; Novellino Alves AT; de Brito Resende RF; Souza EM; Silva EJ; Fidel SR; De-Deus G
    J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1869-73. PubMed ID: 25190606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Histologic evaluation of the characteristics of tissue biocompatibility of 4 materials used in endodontics].
    Calura G; Nonato M; Mazzoli S; Berti G; Ventrelli I
    Mondo Odontostomatol; 1984; 26(5):43-8. PubMed ID: 6242174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of subcutaneous connective tissue responses among three different formulations of gutta-percha used in thermatic techniques.
    Leonardo MR; Utrilla LS; Rothier A; Leonardo RT; Consolaro A
    Int Endod J; 1990 Jul; 23(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 2098337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for antibacterial activity of endodontic gutta-percha cones.
    Moorer WR; Genet JM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 May; 53(5):503-7. PubMed ID: 7048187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tissue response to an acrylic reinforced gutta percha.
    Nicholson RJ; Nguyen NT; Merrill PW; Casanova F
    CDA J; 1979 Sep; 7(9):55-7. PubMed ID: 296901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reaction of rat subcutaneous tissue to implants of gutta-percha for endodontic use.
    Tavares T; Soares IJ; Silveira NL
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1994 Aug; 10(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 7995248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corrosion of silver cones in the subcutaneous connective tissue of the rat: a preliminary scanning electron microscope, electron microprobe, and histological study.
    Zmener O; Dominquez FV
    J Endod; 1985 Feb; 11(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 3855962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Voids in endodontic obturations. Comparative study of rat subcutaneous connective tissue response to implantation of polyethylene tubes and dentin, partially filled with endomethasone and gutta percha cones].
    Soares Zanoni EM; Leonardo MR; Comelli Lia RC; Tagliavini RL
    RGO; 1988; 36(3):232-4, 237-9. PubMed ID: 3270131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histologic reactions to root canal fillings.
    Gutiérrez JH; Gigoux C; Escobar F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1969 Oct; 28(4):557-66. PubMed ID: 5259038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Are Ag-points, gutta percha and amalgam still useful as apical filling materials?].
    D'Haeseleire P; Thielens P; Bourgois F; Vanclooster R
    Acta Stomatol Belg; 1989 Dec; 86(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 2486638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Are Ag-points, gutta percha and amalgam still applicable for apical sealing?].
    D'Haeseleire P; Thielens P; Bourgois F; Vanclooster R
    Acta Stomatol Belg; 1989 Dec; 86(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 2577746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The experimental study on the response of the subcutaneous connective tissue to various pulp capping and root canal filling materials].
    Takahashi C; Hayashi T
    Shigaku; 1968 Dec; 56(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 5251795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Methodology of a standard technic for evaluating bone biocompatibility of canal filling materials: II. Histologic results on 2 materials: gutta percha and zinc oxide eugenol].
    Franquin JC; Salomon JP
    Inf Dent; 1986 Sep; 68(33):3197-209. PubMed ID: 3465705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of overfilled polyethylene tube intraosseous implants in rats.
    Deemer JP; Tsaknis PJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Oct; 48(4):358-73. PubMed ID: 291862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraosseous implantation for biological evaluation of endodontic materials.
    Olsson B; Sliwkowski A; Langeland K
    J Endod; 1981 Jun; 7(6):253-65. PubMed ID: 6454738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.