These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6961376)
1. Thermal discomfort of teeth related to presence or absence of cement bases under amalgam restorations. Piperno S; Barouch E; Hirsch SM; Kaim JM Oper Dent; 1982; 7(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 6961376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity of teeth with and without cement bases under amalgam restorations: a clinical study. Miller BC; Charbeneau GT Oper Dent; 1984; 9(4):130-5. PubMed ID: 6596554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Amalgam restorations: postoperative sensitivity as a function of liner treatment and cavity depth. Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Moorhead JE Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):377-83. PubMed ID: 10823088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity study in vivo: glass-ionomer versus zinc-phosphate bases beneath amalgam restorations. Scherer W; Cooper H; Kaim J; Hittleman E; Staffa J Oper Dent; 1990; 15(5):193-6. PubMed ID: 2098729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors associated with postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations. Al-Omari QD; Al-Omari WM; Omar R J Ir Dent Assoc; 2009; 55(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 19455848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of different liner treatments on postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations. Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Hucke RD; Smith GE Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 10323159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preserving the vital pulp in operative dentistry. King M Dent Update; 2003 Apr; 30(3):159. PubMed ID: 12743918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching adhesive on the reduction of postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations. Hajizadeh H; Akbari M; Ghavamnasiri M; Abedini S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):9-16. PubMed ID: 18997911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth. Royse MC; Ott NW; Mathieu GP Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bases and liners: current concepts. Weiner R J Mass Dent Soc; 1999; 48(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 10740524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results. Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior composite restorations and post-operative sensitivity. Brandt PD; de Wet FA SADJ; 2006 Mar; 61(2):064, 066-8. PubMed ID: 16711558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Thermal diffusivity of bases and restorative dental materials]. Muench A Rev Fac Odontol Sao Paulo; 1974; 12(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 4536129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Temperature in the pulp chamber during polishing of amalgam restorations. Grajower R; Kaufman E; Rajstein J J Dent Res; 1974; 53(5):1189-95. PubMed ID: 4529128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical history of 402 teeth with Class II amalgam restorations. Reuter JE Restorative Dent; 1985 Jan; 1(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 3857696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice. Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]