These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6961809)

  • 1. Changes in nasolabial angle related to maxillary incisor retraction.
    Lo FD; Hunter WS
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Nov; 82(5):384-91. PubMed ID: 6961809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors.
    Talass MF; Talass L; Baker RC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 May; 91(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 3472457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [
    Zhou ZJ; Chen Y; Lin YJ; Sun YT; Wang TG; Mao LX; Liu JQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 34645237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Change in lip contour with maxillary incisor retraction.
    Waldman BH
    Angle Orthod; 1982 Apr; 52(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 6954864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic retraction of incisors in Iranian girls.
    Sodagar A; Borujeni DG; Amini G
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 20877736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Upper lip changes correlated to maxillary incisor retraction--a metallic implant study.
    Ramos AL; Sakima MT; Pinto Ados S; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 16097216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 2351200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile.
    Looi LK; Mills JR
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Jun; 89(6):507-17. PubMed ID: 3459364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of lip thickness and strain on upper lip response to incisor retraction.
    Oliver BM
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 6961784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cephalometric appraisal of nonextraction Begg treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Meistrell ME; Cangialosi TJ; Lopez JE; Cabral-Angeles A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Oct; 90(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 3464190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Soft and hard tissue changes of hyperdivergent class Ⅱ patients before and after orthodontic extraction treatment].
    Mao B; Tian Y; Wang X; Li J; Zhou Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Feb; 56(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 38318905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maxillary incisolabial responses in class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise.
    Owen AH
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jan; 56(1):67-87. PubMed ID: 3456736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in soft tissue profile during and after orthodontic treatment.
    Finnöy JP; Wisth PJ; Böe OE
    Eur J Orthod; 1987 Feb; 9(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 3470187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance.
    Remmer KR; Mamandras AH; Hunter WS; Way DC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Nov; 88(5):363-72. PubMed ID: 3864370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of tensor analysis to investigate facial changes in treated class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Feb; 18(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 8746176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft-tissue changes associated with maxillary incisor retraction.
    Rains MD; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Jun; 81(6):481-8. PubMed ID: 6960733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unpredictability of soft tissue changes after camouflage treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with maximum anterior retraction using miniscrews.
    Kim K; Choi SH; Choi EH; Choi YJ; Hwang CJ; Cha JY
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Mar; 87(2):230-238. PubMed ID: 27768390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonextraction treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusions.
    Arvystas MG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Nov; 88(5):380-95. PubMed ID: 3864372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.