BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6961829)

  • 1. An analysis of Black and Caucasian craniofacial patterns.
    Enlow DH; Pfister C; Richardson E; Kuroda T
    Angle Orthod; 1982 Oct; 52(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 6961829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overbite and face height in 44 male subjects with class I, class II/1 and class II/2 occlusion.
    Adams CP; Kerr WJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 6941889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anteroposterior dental arch and jaw-base relationships in a population sample.
    Zhou L; Mok CW; Hägg U; McGrath C; Bendeus M; Wu J
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 18947277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of arch forms between Israeli and North American white populations.
    Gafni Y; Tzur-Gadassi L; Nojima K; McLaughlin RP; Abed Y; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 21392688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Craniofacial patterns of Japanese adults with various types of malocclusion: a counterpart analysis.
    Oka T; Kawamoto T
    J Osaka Dent Univ; 1994 Dec; 28(1-2):1-16. PubMed ID: 8935067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of facial morphology and sagittal relationship between dental arches in primary and mixed dentition.
    Traldi A; Valdrighi HC; de Souza LZ; Vedovello SA
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(4):63-7. PubMed ID: 26352847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cranial base, sagittal jaw relationship and occlusion. A radiological-craniometric appraisal.
    Varjanne I; Koski K
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1982; 78(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 7156124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients.
    Haraguchi S; Iguchi Y; Takada K
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):421-6. PubMed ID: 18416611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlations among craniofacial angles and dimensions in Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Anderson D; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2923320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion.
    Dhopatkar A; Bhatia S; Rock P
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 12401055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models.
    Slaj M; Spalj S; Jelusic D; Slaj M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):680-7. PubMed ID: 22051488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lower cranial height vs craniofacial dimensions in Angle Class II malocclusion.
    Anderson DL; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Jul; 53(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 6579875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the relationship between rest position of the mandible and malocclusion.
    Sperry TP
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 2774298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 3. Angle Class III malocclusion comparatively analyzed with Class I and Class II patients (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T; Shimizu N; Yamauchi E; Yamada W; Fujiwara K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 6935310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
    Kerr WJ; Ford I
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The lower lip and the maxillary central incisor.
    Luffingham JK
    Eur J Orthod; 1982 Nov; 4(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 6959817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class I and Class III malocclusion sub-groupings related to headform type.
    Martone VD; Enlow DH; Hans MG; Broadbent BH; Oyen O
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(1):35-42; discussion 43-4. PubMed ID: 1554161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American.
    Celebi AA; Keklik H; Tan E; Ucar FI
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 27275615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The occlusal plane in Class I and Class II malocclusion: its relation to craniofacial variables].
    Kuntz M; Turlot JC; Hildwein M
    Orthod Fr; 1988; 59 Pt 2():383-93. PubMed ID: 3078360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations.
    Kook YA; Nojima K; Moon HB; McLaughlin RP; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):680-6. PubMed ID: 15592215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.