These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6962349)

  • 21. Laboratory evaluations of a bi-level, extremely tapered bristled toothbrush and a conventional uniform bristled toothbrush.
    Barnes CM; Covey DA; Shi X; Yankell SL
    Am J Dent; 2009 Apr; 22(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 19626970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of the effects of a sonic toothbrush with ultrasound waveguide in disrupting plaque with and without bristle contact.
    Biesbrock AR; He T; Walters PA; Bartizek RD
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 18578173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Toothbrush age, wear, and plaque control.
    Hegde PP; Ashok KB; Ankola AV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2005; 16(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 16372795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of the Sonicare toothbrush on the structure and thickness of laboratory grown Streptococcus mutans biofilms.
    Heersink J; Costerton WJ; Stoodley P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 12797563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Laboratory evaluation of the reach tooth & gum care toothbrush and three additional manual toothbrushes for subgingival access.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC; Harris M
    J Clin Dent; 1998; 9(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 9835825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The development of a new power toothbrush designed for improved tooth whitening through extrinsic stain removal.
    Biesbrock AR; Bartizek RD
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jan; 17 Spec No():3A-7A. PubMed ID: 14998047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest Complete toothbrush versus the Colgate Total toothbrush and the Oral-B Advantage toothbrush.
    Volpenhein DW; Hartman WL
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):101-5. PubMed ID: 9238886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy of two compact manual toothbrushes.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):111-3. PubMed ID: 8031478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laboratory evaluations of toothbrush interproximal penetration ratios.
    Yost KG; Miluszewski KF; Chen AC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):125-7. PubMed ID: 8031481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A split-mouth comparison of a three-dimensional-action electric toothbrush and a high-frequency electric toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.
    Putt MS; Milleman JL; Davidson KR; Kleber CJ; Cugini M
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 3(4):95-103. PubMed ID: 12666948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparative evaluation of the percent acceptable end-rounded bristles: Butler G.U.M., Colgate Plus, Crest Complete, and Reach.
    Dellerman PA; Burkett TA; Kreyling KM
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 7999288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative laboratory evaluation of two new toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4 Suppl D():D1-4. PubMed ID: 8397835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of new and 3-month-old brush heads in the removal of plaque using a powered toothbrush.
    Hogan LM; Daly CG; Curtis BH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Feb; 34(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 17309587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The finishing of the bristle ends in interdental brushes].
    Reiter C; Wetzel WE
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1991; 101(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 2020838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro safety evaluation of a new ultrasound power toothbrush.
    Sorensen JA; Pham MM; McInnes C
    J Clin Dent; 2008; 19(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 18500157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a sonic toothbrush on removal of stain from enamel surfaces.
    Schemehorn BR; Keil JC
    J Clin Dent; 1995; 6(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 8624231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative efficacy of the Colgate Actibrush battery-powered toothbrush vs Oral-B CrossAction toothbrush on established plaque and gingivitis: a 6-week clinical study.
    Nathoo S; Rustogi KN; Petrone ME; DeVizio W; Zhang YP; Volpe AR; Proskin HM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S19-24; quiz S35. PubMed ID: 11908371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A morphologic and SEM investigation of 58 toothbrushes.
    Adriaens PA; Seynhaeve TM; De Boever JA
    Clin Prev Dent; 1985; 7(5):8-16. PubMed ID: 3878261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of a clamp on toothbrush bristle deterioration.
    Schneider P; Musselman R; Sarkar NK
    J Clin Dent; 1995; 6(4):198-201. PubMed ID: 8624232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of a rippled bristles toothbrush and a flat manual toothbrush.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):82-4. PubMed ID: 8003238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.