These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6962349)

  • 41. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush. results from two independent studies.
    Dörfer CE; von Bethlenfalvy ER; Pioch T; Galustians HJ; Qaqish J; Sharma NC
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 11803988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Plaque removal efficacy and safety of the next generation of manual toothbrush with angled bristle technology: results from three comparative clinical studies.
    Sharma NC; Qaqish JG; Galustians HJ; Cugini M; Thompson MC; Warren PR
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 15810473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of tapered-end toothbrush bristles regarding efficacy of access to occlusal fissures.
    Hotta M; Sekine I; Imade S; Sano A
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(6):225-7. PubMed ID: 12518495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An investigation into the effect of three months' clinical wear on toothbrush efficacy: results from two independent studies.
    Conforti NJ; Cordero RE; Liebman J; Bowman JP; Putt MS; Kuebler DS; Davidson KR; Cugini M; Warren PR
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 12723100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Toothbrush modifications for the handicapped.
    Price VE
    Dent Hyg (Chic); 1980 Oct; 54(10):467-70. PubMed ID: 6450066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dental plaque removal efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush vs. a control Japanese manual toothbrush.
    Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    Am J Dent; 2002 Sep; 15 Spec No():33A-36A. PubMed ID: 12512990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Bristle end-rounding in toothbrushes: a comparison of different evaluation techniques, bristle position and viewing angle.
    Meyer-Lueckel H; Kielbassa AM; Renz H; Hopfenmuller W
    J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 15218712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative efficacy of Colgate Actibrush battery-powered toothbrush and Colgate Plus (manual) toothbrush on established plaque and gingivitis: a 30-day clinical study in New Jersey.
    Sowinski JA; Battista GW; Petrone DM; Petrone ME; Rustogi KN; Chaknis P; DeVizio W; Volpe AR;
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S4-8; quiz S34. PubMed ID: 11908374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Plaque removal and oral health promotion potential for the elmex interX medium toothbrush: clinical efficacy and safety evaluation.
    Sgan-Cohen HD; Vered Y
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(3):70-3. PubMed ID: 14520777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of miswak and tooth brush filaments end-surface texture on enamel. A SEM pilot study.
    Almas K; Atassi F
    Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 12420561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of powered electric toothbrushes: relative degree of bristle end-rounding.
    McLey L; Boyd RL; Sarker S
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(3 Spec No):86-90. PubMed ID: 9238892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of different toothbrushing protocols in poor-toothbrushing orthodontic patients.
    Arici S; Alkan A; Arici N
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 17974538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Plaque removal efficacy of an electric and a manual toothbrush with additional interdental tufts.
    Wiedemann W; Sturm D; de Jager M
    J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 11475710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A study of gingival irritation and plaque removal following a three-minute toothbrushing.
    Yankell SL; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 8031483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Interproximal penetration potential of various bristle designs and degrees of hardness of toothbrushes].
    Nygaard-Ostby P; Evardsen S; Spydevold B
    ZWR; 1981 Jun; 90(6):36-43. PubMed ID: 6948476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of tapered-end toothbrushes regarding subgingival access efficacy.
    Hotta M; Yoshida T; Sekine I; Imada S; Sano A
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(6):156-8. PubMed ID: 9586531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Laboratory evaluations of two toothbrushes for removal of artificial plaque above, around and below the gingival margin.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 12619266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An electron microscopic comparison of bristle end-rounding of three commercial toothbrushes.
    Rawls HR; Smith NK; Lentz DL; Cobb GW; Bailey MS
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):96-100. PubMed ID: 8003240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.
    Sowinski J; Petrone DM; Wachs GN; Chaknis P; Kemp J; Sprosta AA; Devizio W
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 19146124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Weight loss and surface roughness of hard chairside reline resins after toothbrushing: influence of postpolymerization treatments.
    Mendonça MJ; Machado AL; Giampaolo ET; Pavarina AC; Vergani CE
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 16752627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.