These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6962462)

  • 1. [Comparative examination of the abrasion from toothbrushes on composites and amalgams].
    Schlude V; Soltesz U; Klaiber B
    Riv Ital Odontotec; 1981; 17(6):18-40. PubMed ID: 6962462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Brush abrasion with 27 commercial composites and their surface changes in the scanning electron microscope].
    Soltész U; Klaiber B; Schlude V
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):502-5. PubMed ID: 6931812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wear of dental amalgam.
    Roberts JC; Powers JM; Craig RG
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1977 Jul; 11(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 873943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of topical fluoride application on toothbrushing abrasion of resin composites.
    Attin T; Buchalla W; Hellwig E
    Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 16084583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated toothbrushing in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 16268397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion.
    Tanoue N; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 10898845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins.
    Beyth N; Domb AJ; Weiss EI
    J Dent; 2007 Mar; 35(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 16996674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Finish and abrasion of microfilled composites].
    Kurosawa T; Hirabayashi S; Harashima I; Aizawa M; Hirano S; Hirasawa T
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1982 Sep; 8(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 6962570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of nanofillers' size on surface properties after toothbrush abrasion.
    Cavalcante LM; Masouras K; Watts DC; Pimenta LA; Silikas N
    Am J Dent; 2009 Feb; 22(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19281115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modulus of elasticity in bending of composites and amalgams.
    Bryant RW; Mahler DB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Aug; 56(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 3463750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Abrasion resistance of dental materials. 4. The abrasion behavior of Evicrol in contact with amalgam, Dentargam or tooth-coloring plastic].
    Tappe A; Eichhorn T
    Stomatol DDR; 1980 Oct; 30(10):772-8. PubMed ID: 6936925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restoration deterioration related to later failure.
    Smales RJ; Webster DA
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):130-7. PubMed ID: 8152980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Test of wear resistance in composites for Class I and II and silver amalgam].
    Rocchetti V; Savoldi E; Paganelli C; Conti GF; Ragni G; Marchesani A
    Stomatol Mediterr; 1987; 7(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 3483537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of powered electric toothbrushes: laboratory determination of relative abrasion of three powered toothbrushes.
    McLey L; Boyd RL; Sarker S
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(3 Spec No):76-80. PubMed ID: 9238890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on roughness of posterior composite resins.
    dos Santos PH; Consani S; Correr Sobrinho L; Coelho Sinhoreti MA
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 12967075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The abrasion of composites in the region of the lateral teeth--results after 3 years].
    Roulet JF; Mettler P; Friedrich U
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 6997011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of interfacial bond strengths between amalgam and composite inlay.
    Abdel-Aziz AH; Alhadainy HA
    Am J Dent; 1998 Jun; 11(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 9823075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.