These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6962469)

  • 21. Of mice and machine: a paradigmatic challenge to interpretation of the patent statute.
    Chiapetta JR
    William Mitchell Law Rev; 1994; 20(1):155-90. PubMed ID: 11652852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Supreme Court and patenting life.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Oct; 10(5):10-5. PubMed ID: 6934170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Key biotechnology patent delayed.
    Nature; 1982 Jul; 298(5873):409. PubMed ID: 7088186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patentability of genetic inventions in animals.
    Moufang R
    IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 1989; 20(6):823-46. PubMed ID: 11650905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patenting life: no.
    Land RD; Mitchell CB
    First Things; 1996 May; 63():20-2. PubMed ID: 11654352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biotechnology patents: new move confuses US patents world.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1983 Mar; 302(5905):199. PubMed ID: 11653442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Animals as inventions: biotechnology and intellectual property rights.
    Sagoff M
    Rep Inst Philos Public Policy; 1996; 16(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 11654360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patenting of life forms.
    Pautler G
    Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):47-50, 76. PubMed ID: 11649513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetic engineering deflowered.
    New Sci; 1982 Jan; 93(1289):163. PubMed ID: 11655395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patentability of micro-organisms: Diamond v. Chakrabarty.
    Burns K
    Ark Law Rev; 1982; 35(2):313-27. PubMed ID: 11650697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Harvard wins key biotech patent.
    Yanchinski S
    New Sci; 1983 Dec; 100(1387):741. PubMed ID: 11655596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stanford battles for cash from DNA patent.
    Dwyer P
    New Sci; 1982 Nov; 96(1330):277. PubMed ID: 11655465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patenting living organisms--how to beat the bug-rustlers.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1980 Jan; 283(5743):128-9. PubMed ID: 6927917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of USDA quarantine regulations and culture collections in recombinant DNA research.
    Tolin SA
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1981 Dec; 4(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 6946529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Opinions evolve on Kauffman patent.
    Dove A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):373. PubMed ID: 10748506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biotechnology: can a new technology survive?
    Withers WW; Kenworthy PG
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1987; 31(3):673-97. PubMed ID: 11650845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ownership at too high a price?
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):953. PubMed ID: 12949537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Australian innovation covered by US patent.
    Ewing T; Coles P
    Nature; 1989 Oct; 341(6242):473. PubMed ID: 2797173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gene patent policy: does issuing gene patents accord with the purposes of the U.S. patent system?
    Bradshaw J
    Willamette Law Rev; 2001; 37(4):637-60. PubMed ID: 12774776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patenting biological inventions.
    Schlosser SD
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):925-44. PubMed ID: 11649593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.