These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6962507)
21. [Exposure to high impulse noise: analytical methodology and experimental evaluation]. Cosa M; Nicoli M Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1987; 23(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 3565998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): the effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12-hr work shift environment. Reynolds JL; Royster LH; Pearson RG Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Aug; 51(8):437-46. PubMed ID: 2392973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Significance of the low tone test in the detection of probands sensitive to noise]. Pfander F Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1987 Dec; 66(12):648-52. PubMed ID: 3431313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing conservation in mining. McBride DI Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Aug; 54(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 15289584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Communication and noise. Speech intelligibility of airplane pilots with and without active noise compensation]. Matschke RG HNO; 1994 Aug; 42(8):499-504. PubMed ID: 7960953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry. Chung DY; Hardie R; Gannon RP J Occup Med; 1983 Sep; 25(9):679-82. PubMed ID: 6631567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The acoustical attenuation of some combinations of earplugs and earmuffs. Rawlinson RD; Wheeler PD; Custard G Ann Occup Hyg; 1987; 31(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 3426030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of industrial use on the acoustical performance of some earmuffs. Rawlinson RD; Wheeler PD Ann Occup Hyg; 1987; 31(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 3426029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of long term use of hearing protectors in industrial noise. Nilsson R; Lindgren F Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):204-11. PubMed ID: 6939090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Comparative studies of the damming effect and the wearing properties of hearing protective devices at the place of work]. Schulz G; Rublack K; Meister A; Dybowski S; Dubrau KH; Gretzschel D Z Gesamte Hyg; 1983 Feb; 29(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 6858266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Protecting hearing in a military environment. Forrest MR Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():7-12. PubMed ID: 6962514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Current concepts in occupational and non-occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Watson TA; Mahon RG; Whitson ET J S C Med Assoc; 1984 Aug; 80(8):401-3. PubMed ID: 6592401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Hearing protection practice in the Canadian forces. Forshaw SE Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():53-60. PubMed ID: 6962512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. New draft ANSI standard enhances efforts in hearing conservation. Royster JD; Royster LH Occup Health Saf; 1991 Oct; 60(10):86, 89-90. PubMed ID: 1945236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss in the Canadian military. Pelausa EO; Abel SM; Simard J; Dempsey I J Otolaryngol; 1995 Oct; 24(5):271-80. PubMed ID: 8537985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The noise exposed factory workers: the prevalence of sensori-neural hearing loss and their use of personal hearing protection devices. Maisarah SZ; Said H Med J Malaysia; 1993 Sep; 48(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 8183139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]