These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6962692)

  • 1. The influence of various cavity bases on the micro-hardness of composites.
    Marshall SJ; Marshall GW; Harcourt JK
    Aust Dent J; 1982 Oct; 27(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 6962692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A suitable base material for composite resin restorations: zinc oxide eugenol.
    He LH; Purton DG; Swain MV
    J Dent; 2010 Apr; 38(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 19961894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antibacterial potential of contemporary dental luting cements.
    Daugela P; Oziunas R; Zekonis G
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 18493161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of cavity restoration variables on odontoblast cell numbers and dental repair.
    About I; Murray PE; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    J Dent; 2001 Feb; 29(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 11239585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interim luting agents, composite core surface hardness and retention of interim and final restorations.
    Gregory WA; Campbell Z
    Am J Dent; 1990 Oct; 3(5):207-12. PubMed ID: 2076249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes of cement properties caused by mixing errors: the therapeutic range of different cement types.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Loher H; Kolbeck C; Trempler C; Stemplinger B; Kopzon V; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1187-93. PubMed ID: 18372038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base.
    van de Sande FH; Rodolpho PA; Basso GR; Patias R; da Rosa QF; Demarco FF; Opdam NJ; Cenci MS
    Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):669-75. PubMed ID: 25863523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restoration of endodontically treated anterior teeth: an evaluation of coronal microleakage of glass ionomer and composite resin materials.
    Diaz-Arnold AM; Wilcox LR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Dec; 64(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 1706771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
    Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interaction between lining materials and composite resin restorative materials.
    Lingard GL; Davies EH; Von Fraunhofer JA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1981 Mar; 8(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 6453213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical assessment of glass ionomer cements as Class III restorations: a one-year report.
    Osborne JW; Berry TG
    Dent Mater; 1986 Aug; 2(4):147-50. PubMed ID: 2943622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cytotoxic effects of dental composites, adhesive substances, compomers and cements.
    Schedle A; Franz A; Rausch-Fan X; Spittler A; Lucas T; Samorapoompichit P; Sperr W; Boltz-Nitulescu G
    Dent Mater; 1998 Nov; 14(6):429-40. PubMed ID: 10483406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of cements and eugenol on properties of a visible light-cured composite.
    Powell TL; Huget EF
    Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 8327359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps.
    Tarim B; Hafez AA; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):535-42. PubMed ID: 9807135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of three cement bases.
    Heys RJ; Fitzgerald M
    J Dent Res; 1991 Jan; 70(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1991861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of evaporation on the properties of water-based dental luting agents.
    Hondrum SO
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(3):286-90; quiz 291-2. PubMed ID: 11199594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation.
    de Araujo MA; Araújo RM; Marsilio AL
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.