These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6963069)
41. [Reconstruction of the conjunctival cavity: holding in place of the prosthetic form by a transorbitary pin]. Souyris F; Caravel JB Ann Chir Plast; 1973; 18(4):315-7. PubMed ID: 4775920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Surgical management of contracted socket. Betharia SM; Kumar H Indian J Ophthalmol; 1988; 36(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 3235168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of orbital prosthesis motility following enucleation or evisceration with sclerotomy with or without a motility coupling post in dogs. Yi NY; Park SA; Jeong MB; Kim WT; Kim SE; Kim JY; Chae JM; Jang KJ; Seong JK; Seo KM Vet Ophthalmol; 2009; 12(3):139-51. PubMed ID: 19392873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Complications of primary placement of motility post in porous polyethylene implants during enucleation. Yazici B; Akova B; Sanli O Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):828-834. PubMed ID: 17362860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Movement of prosthesis after orbital implants. Mushin AS Proc R Soc Med; 1970 Mar; 63(3):314-5. PubMed ID: 5445588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Ophthalmic implants and explants. Scribbick FW; Scribbick AT Emerg Med Clin North Am; 1994 Aug; 12(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 8062802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Fibrous capsule from extruded implant used as graft material in cul-de-sac reconstruction. Tenzel DP; Conn H; Doss RP Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1989; 5(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 2487227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The Iowa enucleation implant. Spivey BE Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1970; 74(6):1287-95. PubMed ID: 4924047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The use of percutaneous implants for the prosthetic rehabilitation of orbital defects in irradiated cancer patients: a report of clinical outcomes and complications. Kosmidou L; Toljanic JA; Moran WJ; Panje WR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 9509790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Complication of enucleation. Luce CM Trans Pa Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1973; 26(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 4750169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Methacrylic resin implant for sunken upper lid following enucleation. SUGAR HS; FORESTNER HJ Am J Ophthalmol; 1946 Aug; 29():993-1000. PubMed ID: 20994640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Superior sulcus deformity. Bello VM; Levine MR Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 Dec; 98(12):2215-6. PubMed ID: 7447778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Use of the hydroxyapatite ocular implant in the pediatric population. Finger PT; Packer S Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Jan; 113(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 7880309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Insertion of secondary intraorbital implants. Soll DB Arch Ophthalmol; 1973 Mar; 89(3):214-6. PubMed ID: 4266241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The fused orbital implant. Five years' experience. Milauskas AT Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1970; 74(6):1296-306. PubMed ID: 5493414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]