These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6963283)

  • 1. Relationship between subsurface damage and wear of dental restorative composites.
    McKinney JE; Wu W
    J Dent Res; 1982 Sep; 61(9):1083-8. PubMed ID: 6963283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subsurface damage layer of in vivo worn dental composite restorations.
    Wu W; Toth EE; Moffa JF; Ellison JA
    J Dent Res; 1984 May; 63(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 6200522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oscillatory wear tests of dental composites.
    Pilliar RM; Smith DC; Maric B
    J Dent Res; 1984 Sep; 63(9):1166-72. PubMed ID: 6589282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices?
    Ferracane JL
    Dent Mater; 2006 Aug; 22(8):689-92. PubMed ID: 16563492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chemical softening and wear of dental composites.
    McKinney JE; Wu W
    J Dent Res; 1985 Nov; 64(11):1326-31. PubMed ID: 2936780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo wear of composites.
    Powers JM; Ryan MD; Hosking DJ; Goldberg AJ
    J Dent Res; 1983 Oct; 62(10):1089-91. PubMed ID: 6578240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface failure of commercial and experimental restorative resins.
    Powers JM; Roberts JC; Craig RG
    J Dent Res; 1976; 55(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 1063753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Damage to composite restorations].
    Braem MJ; Willems G; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):455-7. PubMed ID: 11921990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulated oral wear of packable composites.
    Clelland NL; Villarroel SC; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):830-7. PubMed ID: 14653301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [In vivo wear test for posterior composites. 1. Development of wear test predicting composite wear in vivo].
    Horie K; Satoh M; Kawakita H; Hosoda H
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Mar; 9(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 2135520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wear patterns and rates of posterior composite resins.
    Leinfelder KF
    Int Dent J; 1987 Sep; 37(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 3316043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of organic peroxide additives on wear resistance of composite resin.
    Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Oct; 18(10):1006-8, 1009-11. PubMed ID: 9533310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro wear response of composite resin, amalgam, and enamel.
    Powell JM; Phillips RW; Norman RD
    J Dent Res; 1975; 54(6):1183-95. PubMed ID: 1059657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential wear of teeth and restorative materials: clinical implications.
    Yip KH; Smales RJ; Kaidonis JA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 15237885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal corrosion in dental composite wear.
    Sarkar NK
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000; 53(4):371-80. PubMed ID: 10898878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo evaluation of the surface of posterior resin composite restorations: a pilot study.
    Pesun IJ; Olson AK; Hodges JS; Anderson GC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 11005910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attrition at the enamel-restoration interface.
    Chowdhury MU; Kobayashi K; Uchiyama Y
    Asian J Aesthet Dent; 1995; 3():23-30. PubMed ID: 9063106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Composites versus amalgam: comparative measurements of abrasion resistance in vivo: 1-year results].
    Meier C; Lutz F
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Mar; 89(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 293032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.