These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6963283)

  • 21. In vitro wear of aged composite restorative materials.
    Fan PL; Powers JM
    J Dent Res; 1980 Dec; 59(12):2066-70. PubMed ID: 6941994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of an adhesive bonding system on wear resistance of resin composite restorations.
    Shinkai K; Suzuki S; Katoh Y
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Oct; 28(10):687-93. PubMed ID: 9477890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measurement of the rate of wear of dental composite resins by a 90Sr beta particle transmission gauge.
    Moores GE; Glentworth P; Harrison A
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 Sep; 17(5):843-53. PubMed ID: 6619180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of contact stress, sliding velocity, and surface roughness on the sliding wear of a composite restorative.
    Bailey WF; Rice SL; Albert RL; Temin SC
    J Dent Res; 1981 May; 60(5):914-8. PubMed ID: 6938567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition: a 7-year follow-up of a prospective randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial.
    Al-Khayatt AS; Ray-Chaudhuri A; Poyser NJ; Briggs PF; Porter RW; Kelleher MG; Eliyas S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 May; 40(5):389-401. PubMed ID: 23496025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative in vitro sliding-wear study of conventional, microfilled, and light-cured composite restoratives.
    Rice SL; Bailey WF; Wayne SF; Burns JA
    J Dent Res; 1984 Sep; 63(9):1173-5. PubMed ID: 6589283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vivo occlusal wear of posterior composite restorations.
    Lewis G
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 1803330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Studies on posterior composite resins with special reference to class II restorations.
    Lundin SA
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 73():1-41. PubMed ID: 2264013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth?
    Baldissera RA; Corrêa MB; Schuch HS; Collares K; Nascimento GG; Jardim PS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):1027-35. PubMed ID: 24001506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical wear rate of direct and indirect posterior composite resin restorations.
    Cetin AR; Unlu N
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Jun; 32(3):e87-94. PubMed ID: 22408783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up).
    Gulamali AB; Hemmings KW; Tredwin CJ; Petrie A
    Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):E9. PubMed ID: 21869770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The relationship between porosity, compressive fatigue limit and wear in composite resin restorative materials.
    McCabe JF; Ogden AR
    Dent Mater; 1987 Feb; 3(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 3471609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictors of clinical wear of restorative dental composite materials.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1993; 3(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 8193568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microscopic observations of the wear of a tooth restorative composite in vivo.
    Abell AK; Leinfelder KF; Turner DT
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):501-7. PubMed ID: 6223040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Direct composite restorative materials.
    Puckett AD; Fitchie JG; Kirk PC; Gamblin J
    Dent Clin North Am; 2007 Jul; 51(3):659-75, vii. PubMed ID: 17586149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vivo and in vitro wear of potential posterior composites.
    Lutz F; Phillips RW; Roulet JF; Setcos JC
    J Dent Res; 1984 Jun; 63(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 6588079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Latest innovations in flowable composites.
    Miller MB
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 21903518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.