These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6963283)

  • 41. Effect of fiber volume fraction and length on the wear characteristics of glass fiber-reinforced dental composites.
    Callaghan DJ; Vaziri A; Nayeb-Hashemi H
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 16002133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Two- and three-body wear of composite resins.
    Koottathape N; Takahashi H; Iwasaki N; Kanehira M; Finger WJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1261-70. PubMed ID: 23083806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A novel method for non-tack compaction of resin composites.
    Millstein P; Abedian B
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2002; 51(1):42-3. PubMed ID: 11949576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Wear of dental amalgam.
    Roberts JC; Powers JM; Craig RG
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1977 Jul; 11(4):513-23. PubMed ID: 873943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Two-body wear of dental composites under different loads.
    Marquis PM; Hu X; Shortall AC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 11203672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [An in vitro study of wear and marginal fracture of posterior composite resins].
    Futatsuki M; Nakata M
    Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1990; 28(4):937-48. PubMed ID: 2134129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Composite restorative materials in dental practice: a review.
    Paffenbarger GC; Rupp NW
    Int Dent J; 1974 Mar; 24(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 4600473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A new composite restorative based on a hydrophobic matrix.
    Douglas WH; Craig RG; Chen CJ
    J Dent Res; 1979 Oct; 58(10):1981-6. PubMed ID: 291622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Using a new condensable composite for posterior restorations.
    Poss SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (23):S14-8. PubMed ID: 12089754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Placement technique for direct posterior composite restorations.
    Javaheri DS
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):195-200; quiz 202. PubMed ID: 11360766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.
    Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An advance in condensable composites.
    Munoz-Viveros CA
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (23):S3-5. PubMed ID: 12089755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of biofilm on the repair bond strengths of composites.
    Rinastiti M; Özcan M; Siswomihardjo W; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC
    J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1476-81. PubMed ID: 20940354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations?
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Barink M; Verdonschot N
    J Dent Res; 2003 Dec; 82(12):967-71. PubMed ID: 14630896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique.
    Lutz E; Krejci I; Oldenburg TR
    Quintessence Int; 1986 Dec; 17(12):777-84. PubMed ID: 3468527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Determination of mode of fracture of adhesive restorative materials. An invitro study.
    Nayak UA; Suasha P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 12420578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Hybrid composites: providing the best for conservative restorations.
    Gleghorn T
    Dent Today; 2000 Aug; 19(8):90, 92. PubMed ID: 12524752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.