These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Cusp pattern, tooth size and third molar agenesis in the human mandibular dentition. Lavelle CL; Ashton EH; Flinn RM Arch Oral Biol; 1970 Mar; 15(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 5268156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study on the influence of third point of reference on condylar guidance settings in a semi-adjustable articulator with lateral cephalographs: An in-vivo study. Aldhuwayhi S; Mustafa MZ; Shaikh SA; Mehta S; Mathar MI; Thakare AA; Varadharaju VK; Ayub MS; Shamsudeen SM; A Khan AR Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Oct; 24(10):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 34657010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Individual differences in the form and some bone formations of the mandible]. Smirnov VG Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1968; 47(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 5237921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlations between the dimensions of human teeth, the dental arch and the mandible. Kanazawa E; Sekikawa M; Ozaki T J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1987 Sep; 29(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 3480944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms. Nojima K; McLaughlin RP; Isshiki Y; Sinclair PM Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 11407772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The geometric analysis of mandibular dental arch form. Savostin-Asling I Ann Dent; 1980; 39(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 6929179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Chang HP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Aug; 92(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 3475966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aging in the craniofacial complex. Dager MM; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):440-4. PubMed ID: 18416619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship of arch length to alterations in dental arch width. Hnat WP; Braun S; Chinhara A; Legan HL Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 10935959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch? El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multi-dimensional orthodontic and prosthodontic study cast analysis. Byland J Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2003; 14(3):9-14. PubMed ID: 14596154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The limits of the mandibular dentition]. Marché-Seyrat M Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1985 Apr; 19(2):151-64. PubMed ID: 3865322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations. Kook YA; Nojima K; Moon HB; McLaughlin RP; Sinclair PM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):680-6. PubMed ID: 15592215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Size of the mandibular arch in relation to growth]. Minervini G; Caruso F; Galantuomo P; Belardo S Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1984; 25(3):265-76. PubMed ID: 6598951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Longitudinal study of dental arch widths at four stages of dentition. Knott VB Angle Orthod; 1972 Oct; 42(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 4507154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]