BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6963773)

  • 1. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Herbst appliance--its biologic effects and clinical use.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Jan; 87(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 3855346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
    Pancherz H; Malmgren O; Hägg U; Omblus J; Hansen K
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance].
    Schiavoni R
    Mondo Ortod; 1990; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Pancherz H; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 3863486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post-treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. A radiographic, clinical and biometric investigation.
    Hansen K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1992; 88():1-49. PubMed ID: 1492308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Oct; 76(4):423-42. PubMed ID: 291343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Pancherz H; Fackel U
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 2351206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Windmiller EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of Andresen therapy on class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Calvert FJ
    Br J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 9(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6954989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of Class II high angle malocclusions with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation.
    Schiavoni R; Grenga V; Macri V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Nov; 102(5):393-409. PubMed ID: 1476105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphologic changes in the sagittal dimension using the Fränkel appliance.
    Owen AH
    Am J Orthod; 1981 Dec; 80(6):573-603. PubMed ID: 6947692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise appliances--a comparative study of mandibular growth and facial esthetics.
    Adenwalla ST; Kronman JH
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):281-98. PubMed ID: 3865566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Position changes of mandibular condyle in Herbst treatment. Radiographic study].
    Pancherz H; Stickel A
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1989; 21(4):515-27. PubMed ID: 2636216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anterior vertical changes in function regulator therapy.
    Haynes S
    Eur J Orthod; 1983 Aug; 5(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 6578044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes in patients with a Class II relationship treated with clear aligner mandibular advancement and Herbst appliance followed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment.
    Hosseini HR; Ngan P; Tai SK; Andrews LJ; Xiang J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Feb; 165(2):205-219. PubMed ID: 37831020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance.
    Remmer KR; Mamandras AH; Hunter WS; Way DC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Nov; 88(5):363-72. PubMed ID: 3864370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.