These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6965069)

  • 21. [Value of an anatomo-morphological classification of Class II].
    Luyten C
    Acta Stomatol Belg; 1992 Dec; 89(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 1296460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An anatomical and radiographic study of medial depression of the human mandibular ramus.
    Carvalho IM; Damante JH; Tallents RH; Ribeiro-Rotta RF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 11681482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Estimation of the gonial angle from the orthopantomogram-- class III case (author's transl)].
    Niwa K; Suzuki Y; Sumikawa Y; Katayama M; Kishimoto T
    Gifu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Nov; 9(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 6955372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A cephalometric comparison between class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion.
    Godiawala RN; Joshi MR
    Angle Orthod; 1974 Jul; 44(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 4527603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Positional and morphologic relations of the facial skeleton].
    Arat M; Gürbüz F; Bayazit Z; Berksü B
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1988 Dec; 49(6):513-21. PubMed ID: 3215600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Facial variations related to headform type.
    Bhat M; Enlow DH
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):269-80. PubMed ID: 3865565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extension of cephalo-photometric analysis.
    Bütow KW
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1987 Apr; 15(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 3473083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of profile evaluations in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Green WN; Kallal RH; Skarin DA; Dubois LM; Forbes DP
    Northwest Dent Res; 1995; 6(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 9487918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Class II division 2 skeletal pattern.
    Brezniak N; Arad A; Heler M; Wasserstein A
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Apr; 68(2):104. PubMed ID: 9564418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of Twin-Block and Faramand-LL appliances on soft tissue profile in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Yassaei S; Jamilian A; Joshan N
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):57-62. PubMed ID: 25745712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Indications and limits on the choice of extraction of l4-24 and 35-45 in treating Angle class-II malocclusion by a Tweed-Merrifield analysis of the total space].
    Jegou I
    Orthod Fr; 1984; 55(2):485-94. PubMed ID: 6599559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 3. Angle Class III malocclusion comparatively analyzed with Class I and Class II patients (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T; Shimizu N; Yamauchi E; Yamada W; Fujiwara K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 6935310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Analysis of the components of facial growth by the structural superimposition of profile teleradiographs].
    Moorrees CF; Kent RL; Efstratiadis SS; Reed RB
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed (1984); 1986 Dec; 96(12):1513-28. PubMed ID: 3467431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 2. On Angle Class II malocclusion (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T; Okada T; Ichikawa M; Kubota M; Iwasaki T
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 6935309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pathognomonic cephalometric characteristics of Angle Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Brezniak N; Arad A; Heller M; Dinbar A; Dinte A; Wasserstein A
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Jun; 72(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 12071609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Sagittal dimensions and changes in cranio-facial structures due to growth in distoocclusion].
    Marić D
    Med Pregl; 1980; 33(11-12):453-6. PubMed ID: 7289981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Contribution of three dimensional cephalometry in the study of determining morphological parameters for facial esthetics].
    Zribi A; Faure J
    Orthod Fr; 2014 Mar; 85(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 24685249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
    Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.