These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6965166)
1. Quality of life and terminal illness. Wilcox DP Tex Med; 1981 Sep; 77(9):80-2. PubMed ID: 6965166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Responsibility to treat premature and newborn infants from the legal viewpoint]. Ulsenheimer K Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Nov; 87(10-11):875-81; discussion 881-6. PubMed ID: 8303931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath. Glantz LH; Swazey JP Forum Med; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 10289145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An exercise in futility. Are we bidden to "treat" the untreatable? Tong R N C Med J; 1993 Aug; 54(8):386-91. PubMed ID: 8377850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A compelling state interest? Curtin LL Nurs Manage; 1989 Oct; 20(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 2511530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Judicial approach beginning to develop for terminating life support systems. Part 1. Weissburg C; Hartz JN Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Aug; 12(4):44-8. PubMed ID: 10242941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What ever happened to Baby Jane Doe? Colen BD Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(3):2. PubMed ID: 8088998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The California Natural Death Act: an empirical study of physicians' practices. Redleaf DL; Schmitt SB; Thompson WC Stanford Law Rev; 1979 May; 31(5):913-45. PubMed ID: 10243334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The bedside nurse in terminal care: the right to die. Mehling AV J Pract Nurs; 1980 Jun; 30(6):20-1. PubMed ID: 6900069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Minnesota case pits patient's rights versus futile care, judge weighs life and death decision. Hosp Patient Relat Rep; 1991 Jul; 6(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 10121833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical ethics after Quinlan: guidelines and the ethics of dying. Hudson RP J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 83(7):371-5, 340. PubMed ID: 7119537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience. Thomson CJ Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz. Carroll PR Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Living wills: personal and professional perspectives. Death at a New York hospital. Law Med Health Care; 1985 Dec; 13(6):260-82. PubMed ID: 3854892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Canadian Charter of Rights and individual choice in treatment. Ferguson G Health Law Can; 1988; 8(3):63-70, 85. PubMed ID: 10312613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perspectives. Life and death decisions. McCormick K Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1989 Feb; 43(7):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10291919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What are the basic provisions of California's new "Right to Die Bill?". Gordon PA Hosp Forum; 1976 Nov; 19(6):17, 22. PubMed ID: 10242087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Brain death/termination of heroic efforts to save life--who decides? Ufford MR Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1980 Dec; 2(10):5-39. PubMed ID: 10295069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Court intervention and the diminution of patients' rights: the case of Brother Joseph Fox. Paris JJ N Engl J Med; 1980 Oct; 303(15):876-8. PubMed ID: 7412806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]