BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6966228)

  • 1. Determination of odour affinities based on the dose-response relationships of the frog's electro-olfactogram.
    Senf W; Menco BP; Punter PH; Duyvesteyn P
    Experientia; 1980 Feb; 36(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 6966228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigations of the discriminative properties of the frog's olfactory mucosa using a photoactivable odorant.
    Delaleu JC; Holley A
    Neurosci Lett; 1983 Jun; 37(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 6888800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A chemical modification approach to the olfactory code: vapor phase labeling using photoaffinity odorants.
    Menevşe S; Menevşe A
    Jpn J Physiol; 1989; 39(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 2615038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of concanavalin A on the rat electro-olfactogram at various odorant concentrations.
    Shirley SG; Polak EH; Edwards DA; Wood MA; Dodd GH
    Biochem J; 1987 Jul; 245(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 3663144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanism underlying the analysis of odorant quality at the level of the olfactory mucosa. II. Receptor selective sensitivity.
    Blank DL
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1974 Sep; 237(0):91-101. PubMed ID: 4547370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Signal-detecting mechanisms in the olfactory epithelium: molecular discrimination.
    Getchell TV; Getchell ML
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1974 Sep; 237(0):62-75. PubMed ID: 4528956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unitary recordings of near threshold responses of receptor cells in the olfactory mucosa of the frog.
    Drongelen W
    J Physiol; 1978 Apr; 277():423-35. PubMed ID: 306439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial distribution of the EOG in the rat; a variation with odour quality.
    Thommesen G; Doving KB
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1977 Mar; 99(3):270-80. PubMed ID: 66856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Receptor cell responses to odorants: similarities and differences among odorants.
    Sicard G; Holley A
    Brain Res; 1984 Feb; 292(2):283-96. PubMed ID: 6692160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Topographic coding of odorant quality is maintained at different concentrations in the salamander olfactory epithelium.
    Mackay-Sim A; Shaman P
    Brain Res; 1984 Apr; 297(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 6722540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recording of the human electro-olfactogram.
    Knecht M; Hummel T
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Oct; 83(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 15501486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The underwater electro-olfactogram: a tool for the study of the sense of smell of marine fishes.
    Silver WL; Caprio J; Blackwell JF; Tucker D
    Experientia; 1976 Sep; 32(9):1216-7. PubMed ID: 971769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The role of cyclic adenosine-3',5'-monophosphate in olfactory reception].
    Minor AV; Sakina NL
    Neirofiziologiia; 1973; 5(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 4360105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Olfactory coding on the basis of physicochemical properties.
    Laffort P; Patte F; Etcheto M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1974 Sep; 237(0):193-208. PubMed ID: 4529029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An electrophysiological study of odour similarities of homologous substances.
    Döving KB
    J Physiol; 1966 Sep; 186(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 5914260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of concanavalin A on the rat electro-olfactogram. Differential inhibition of odorant response.
    Shirley SG; Polak EH; Mather RA; Dodd GH
    Biochem J; 1987 Jul; 245(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 3663143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ciliary action and normal movement of odorant wavefronts in garfish nasal capsule of Lepisosteus osseus.
    Bashor DP; Beuerman RW; Easton DM
    Experientia; 1974 Jul; 30(7):777-9. PubMed ID: 4847669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative and quantitative discrimination in the frog olfactory receptors: analysis from electrophysiological data.
    Holley A; Duchamp A; Revial MF; Juge A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1974 Sep; 237(0):102-14. PubMed ID: 4529253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A chemical-modification approach to the olfactory code. Studies with a thiol-specific reagent.
    Menevse A; Dodd G; Poynder TM
    Biochem J; 1978 Dec; 176(3):845-54. PubMed ID: 311638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tests of the sorption and olfactory "fovea" hypotheses in the mouse.
    Coppola DM; Ritchie BE; Craven BA
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Nov; 118(5):2770-2788. PubMed ID: 28877965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.