These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 696962)

  • 1. [Clinical use of the obstetical monitor. IV. A functional test without loading for determining fetal status ("non-stress test")].
    Khadzhiev A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1978; 17(4):235-44. PubMed ID: 696962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Fetal acoustic stimulation test].
    Landa L; Alarcón H
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1982; 47(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7184064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress and nonstress antepartum fetal monitoring: current status.
    Weingold AB; Yonekura ML; O'Kieffe J
    Obstet Gynecol Annu; 1980; 9():139-67. PubMed ID: 7402501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antepartum stress test monitoring.
    Garite TJ; Freeman RK
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Aug; 6(2):295-307. PubMed ID: 498681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical evaluation of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring and its combined test].
    Shao YL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1983 Oct; 18(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 6675917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Fetal challenge tests and non-stress tests. An analysis and comparison of the possibilities of predicting perinatal problems].
    Neldam S; Hansen T; Jessen P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1981 Dec; 143(51):3465-9. PubMed ID: 7336506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Placental perfusion, endocrine parameters of pregnancy and cardiotocographic non-stress tests in cases of intrauterine retardation].
    Doszpod J; Török M; Prievara F; Csákány MG; Gáti I
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1984; 106(21):1413-8. PubMed ID: 6516633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Monitoring of high-risk pregnancies. Complementary aspects of the nonstress test, the oxytocin test and the biophysical score].
    Beco J; Lambotte R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 3546475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The non-stress versus stress test. Contraposition or integration? Role of fetal sound stimulation].
    Bouché M; Ravazzolo MP
    Minerva Ginecol; 1984 May; 36(5):251-8. PubMed ID: 6472719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of breast stimulation for antepartum stress testing.
    Capeless EL; Mann LI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 64(5):641-5. PubMed ID: 6493657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stress and nonstress antepartum monitoring.
    Petrie RH
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1980; 44():151-69. PubMed ID: 6994120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The oxytocin challenge test in high-risk pregnancies.
    Ramsewak S; Suratsingh J; Roopnarinesingh S
    West Indian Med J; 1981 Jun; 30(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 7257345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of nipple stimulation to obtain contraction stress test.
    Lenke RR; Nemes JM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Mar; 63(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 6700857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Acoustic stimulation test versus oxytocin challenge test for fetal well-being].
    Zohar S; Bilenka B; Ballas S
    Harefuah; 1982 Jun; 102(11):464-6. PubMed ID: 7160684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Acceleration test of fetal cardiac rhythm. Its use in monitoring prolonged pregnancies. Comparison with the ocytocin test].
    Higier J; Staszewski A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1983; 12(4):381-3. PubMed ID: 6630918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Use of a combination of non stress fetal heart rate monitoring and the oxytocin challenge test in high-risk pregnancies. The effects on perinatal mortality (author's transl)].
    Galvez-Hernandez E; Jimeno-Garcia JM; Novo-Dominguez A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1981; 10(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 7252089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antepartal cardiotocography in the assessment of fetal outcome.
    Käär K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1980; 94():1-56. PubMed ID: 6935909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A study on oxytocin challenge test of the fetus with quantitative tocodynamometry determined by contraction index (author's transl)].
    Sawazumi K
    Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn; 1981 Jul; 33(7):987-95. PubMed ID: 7304139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Changes in and characteristics of the monitoring of the reactivity and variability of the heart rate of the premature fetus during a non stress test (NST)].
    Ivanov S; Georgiev R
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1983; 22(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 6638376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.