These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6972848)

  • 1. Clinical cardiovascular experiences with iopamidol: a new non-ionic contrast medium.
    Partridge JB; Robinson PJ; Turnbull CM; Stoker JB; Boyle RM; Morrison GW
    Clin Radiol; 1981 Jul; 32(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 6972848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast media for left ventricular angiography. A comparison between Cardio-Conray and iopamidol.
    Gwilt DJ; Nagle RE
    Br Heart J; 1984 Apr; 51(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 6200129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative neurotoxicity of angiographic contrast media.
    Velaj R; Drayer B; Albright R; Fram E
    Neurology; 1985 Sep; 35(9):1290-8. PubMed ID: 3927186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
    Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of ionic and nonionic contrast media on the sickling phenomenon.
    Rao VM; Rao AK; Steiner RM; Burka ER; Grainger RG; Ballas SK
    Radiology; 1982 Jul; 144(2):291-3. PubMed ID: 7089282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Iopamidol compared with Conray in peripheral angiography.
    Wojciechowski J; Johansson R; Björk L
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1982; 23(6):549-52. PubMed ID: 6763456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast agent induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: iopamidol versus meglumine iothalamate.
    Lea Thomas M; Keeling FP; Piaggio RB; Treweeke PS
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Mar; 57(675):205-7. PubMed ID: 6365232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of the acute cardiovascular side effects of iopamidol, metrizamide and amidotrizoate after intracoronary and left ventricular injections].
    Schräder R; Wolpers HG; Hoeft A; Korb H; Hellige G
    Radiologe; 1984 May; 24(5):240-6. PubMed ID: 6463236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pulmonary angiography with iopamidol and Renografin 76 in normal and pulmonary hypertensive dogs.
    Thompson WM; Mills SR; Bates M; Hedlund L; Rommel J
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1983; 24(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 6666667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiovascular effects induced by the injection of a new nonionic contrast medium (Iopamidol): experimental study in dogs.
    Di Donato M; Bongrani S; Cucchini F; Baldi G; Fappani A; Colla B; Visioli O
    Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 489271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety of contrast media in cerebral angiography: iopamidol vs. methylglucamine iothalamate.
    Bird CR; Drayer BP; Velaj R; Triolo PJ; Allen S; Bates M; Yeates AE; Heinz ER; Osborne DR
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1984; 5(6):801-3. PubMed ID: 6437183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Femoral artery flow and pain during lumbar aortography: comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media.
    Padayachee TS; Reidy JF; King DH; Reeves M; Gosling RG
    Clin Radiol; 1983 Jan; 34(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 6822042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absence of myocardial biochemical toxicity with a nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol).
    Wisneski JA; Gertz EW; Neese RA; Morris DL
    Am Heart J; 1985 Sep; 110(3):609-17. PubMed ID: 4036786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The risk of arachnoiditis from experimental nonionic contrast media.
    Haughton VM; Ho KC
    Radiology; 1980 Aug; 136(2):395-7. PubMed ID: 6773100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of iopamidol with three other contrast media in orbital venography/cavernous sinography.
    Macpherson P
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Jul; 55(655):539-40. PubMed ID: 7150905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective coronary arteriography: a clinical comparison of two contrast agents.
    Shirey EK; Sones FM; Greenstreet RL
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1983; 9(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 6627384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Iopamidol and meglumine diatrizoate: comparison of effects on patient discomfort during aortofemoral arteriography.
    Widrich WC; Beckman CF; Robbins AH; Scholz FJ; Srinivasan MK; Hayes EJ; Kellum CD; Newman T
    Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 6344138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Renal tubular damage after rapid intravenous contrast study with iopamidol].
    Stratta P; Porcellini G; Bianchi SD; Granone A; Gatti G; Salomone M; Ragni R
    Minerva Med; 1981 Jul; 72(28):1859-62. PubMed ID: 7254634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the cardiovascular responses to carotid injections of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Morris TW; Francis M; Fischer HW
    Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 468493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibition of platelet function by contrast media: iopamidol and ioxaglate versus iothalamate. Work in progress.
    Rao AK; Rao VM; Willis J; Beckett C; Steiner RM
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 4011893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.