69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6974962)
1. Improved routine chest radiography with a trough filter.
Wieder S; Adams PL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Oct; 137(4):695-8. PubMed ID: 6974962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chest radiography with a shaped filter at 140 kVp: its diagnostic accuracy compared with that of standard radiographs.
Guilbeau JC; Mazoyer BM; Pruvost P; Verrey B; Grenier P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1007-10. PubMed ID: 3258700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduction of radiation exposure in radiography of the chest.
Rossi RP; Harnisch B; Hendee WR
Radiology; 1982 Sep; 144(4):909-14. PubMed ID: 7111745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A scanning equalization system for improved chest radiography.
Plewes DB; Wandtke JC
Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):765-8. PubMed ID: 7063700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The AMBER thoracic imaging system in routine diagnosis].
Luska G; Rabold J; Herzog R; von Boetticher H
Radiologe; 1993 Jun; 33(6):361-6. PubMed ID: 8332732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mobile 240 kVp phototimed chest radiography.
Tabrisky J; Herman MW; Torrance DJ; Hieshima GB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Aug; 135(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 6773330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Can digital luminescent radiography substitute for conventional x-ray technics in chest radiography?].
Neufang KF; Krug B; Lorenz R; Steinbrich W
Rofo; 1990 May; 152(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 2160680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 350 kVp chest radiography: review and comparison with 120 kVp.
Proto AV; Lane EJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 May; 130(5):859-66. PubMed ID: 417584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exposure equalization radiography of the chest: clinical comparison of slit and raster scanning techniques.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jun; 144(6):1171-81. PubMed ID: 3873796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Suitability and comparison of compensating filters for thoracic diagnosis].
Oestmann JW; Hendrickx P; Rieder P; Geerlings H
Rofo; 1986 Apr; 144(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 3008250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low-scatter chest radiographs.
Sorenson JA; Mitchell CR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3496751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients.
Swensen SJ; Gray JE; Brown LR; Aughenbaugh GL; Harms GF; Stears J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Thoracic radiography. Comparison of asymmetric screen-film, technic of mechanical homogenization, and conventional technics].
Ciccotosto C; Bartelli F; Bellelli M; Gavelli G; Guidotti A; Pirronti T; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 1995; 90(1-2):24-32. PubMed ID: 7569092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality.
Prasad SR; Wittram C; Shepard JA; McLoud T; Rhea J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):461-5. PubMed ID: 12130452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
