These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6975999)

  • 1. Intracranial self-stimulation in 3-day-old rat pups.
    Moran TH; Lew MF; Blass EM
    Science; 1981 Dec; 214(4527):1366-8. PubMed ID: 6975999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-stimulation in 7- and 10-day-old rats.
    Lithgow T; Barr GA
    Behav Neurosci; 1984 Jun; 98(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 6610433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methylazoxymethanol acetate cortical hypoplasia alters the pattern of stimulation-induced behavior in neonatal rats.
    Moran TH; Sanberg PR; Antuono PG; Coyle JT
    Brain Res; 1986 Jun; 392(1-2):235-42. PubMed ID: 3486698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility scaling of intracranial reinforcement duration.
    Coleman WR; Berger LH
    Physiol Behav; 1978 Oct; 21(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 311015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intensity generalization with positively reinforcing intracranial stimulation.
    Stutz RM; Hastings L; Rossi RR; Maroli AN
    Physiol Behav; 1978 Oct; 21(4):531-5. PubMed ID: 311016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of knife-cut lesions of the medial forebrain bundle in self-stimulating rats.
    Janas JD; Stellar JR
    Behav Neurosci; 1987 Dec; 101(6):832-45. PubMed ID: 3501293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulation-induced ingestion in neonatal rats.
    Moran TH; Schwartz GJ; Blass EM
    Brain Res; 1983 Apr; 283(2-3):197-204. PubMed ID: 6601974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of lesions of various medial forebrain bundle components on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation.
    Stiglick A; White N
    Brain Res; 1977 Sep; 133(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 302729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous rate-independent and rate-dependent assessment of intracranial self-stimulation: evidence for the direct involvement of dopamine in brain reinforcement mechanisms.
    Zarevics P; Setler PE
    Brain Res; 1979 Jun; 169(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 312681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strength-duration analysis of the organization of reinforcement pathways in the medial forebrain bundle of rats.
    White N
    Brain Res; 1976 Jul; 110(3):575-91. PubMed ID: 947473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task-dependent properties of brain stimulation reward.
    Lyons HI; Freedman NL
    Behav Brain Res; 1982 Apr; 4(4):339-58. PubMed ID: 6978722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The central basis of motivation: intracranial self-stimulation studies.
    Olds ME; Fobes JL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1981; 32():523-74. PubMed ID: 7015997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of ipsilateral forebrain in lateral hypothalamic stimulation reward in rats.
    Stellar JR; Illes J; Mills LE
    Physiol Behav; 1982 Dec; 29(6):1089-97. PubMed ID: 6984513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptation effects of medial forebrain bundle micro-electrical stimulation.
    Farakhor S; Shalchyan V; Daliri MR
    Bioengineered; 2019 Dec; 10(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 30916601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effect of the intensity of the stimulating current on intracranial self-stimulation in the rat].
    Morgado Bernal I; García Sevilla L
    Arch Neurobiol (Madr); 1983; 46(6):403-8. PubMed ID: 6608332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pharmaco-ontogeny of reward: enhancement of self-stimulation by D-amphetamine and cocaine in 3- and 10-day-old rats.
    Barr GA; Lithgow T
    Brain Res; 1986 Jan; 389(1-2):193-202. PubMed ID: 3948007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Secondary reinforcement established with intracranial stimulation in rat.
    Hagen RL
    Psychol Rep; 1977 Feb; 40(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 300164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subject control as a determinant of the reinforcing properties of intracranial stimulation.
    Tsang WK; Stutz RM
    Physiol Behav; 1984 May; 32(5):795-802. PubMed ID: 6333691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Basal forebrain knife cuts and medial forebrain bundle self-stimulation.
    Waraczynski MA
    Brain Res; 1988 Jan; 438(1-2):8-22. PubMed ID: 3257893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological characteristics of neurons in forebrain regions implicated in self-stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle in the rat.
    Rompré PP; Shizgal P
    Brain Res; 1986 Feb; 364(2):338-49. PubMed ID: 3484994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.