263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6976109)
1. Federal radiation initiatives wane in Reagan administration.
Linton OW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Dec; 137(6):1278-83. PubMed ID: 6976109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perspectives of U.S. government agencies on the potential role of greater scientific understanding of low-dose radiation effects in establishing regulatory health protection guidance.
Tenforde TS; Brooks AL
Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):516-8. PubMed ID: 19820462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of the federal Government in health and medical affairs.
Lee PR
N Engl J Med; 1968 Nov; 279(21):1139-47. PubMed ID: 5686482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. budget. Science spared from domestic spending freeze--for now.
Mervis J
Science; 2010 Feb; 327(5966):628-30. PubMed ID: 20133540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Food and Drug Administration's role in the protection of human subjects.
Nightingale SL
IRB; 1983; 5(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11649511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Science policy. 2005 budget makes flat a virtue.
Malakoff D
Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5659):748-50. PubMed ID: 14764844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. radiation protection: role of national and international recommendations and opportunities for collaboration (harmony, not dissonance).
Boyd MA
Health Phys; 2015 Feb; 108(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 25551510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Corporate responsibility for recombinant DNA activities.
Berger BA
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):913-24. PubMed ID: 11649592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. 2003 budget. War effort shapes U.S. budget, with some program casualties.
Malakoff D
Science; 2002 Feb; 295(5557):952-4. PubMed ID: 11834796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulating biotechnology.
McGarity TO
Issues Sci Technol; 1985; 1(3):40-56. PubMed ID: 11649701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Policy decision-making under scientific uncertainty: radiological risk assessment and the role of expert advisory groups.
Mossman KL
Health Phys; 2009 Aug; 97(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 19590269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulation of genetic engineering: less concern about Frankensteins but time for action on commercial production.
Karny GM
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):815-68. PubMed ID: 11649588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation protection challenges facing the federal agencies.
Jones CR
Health Phys; 2004 Sep; 87(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 15303063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Carter administration's health budget: charting new priorities with limited dollars.
Iglehart JK
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1978; 56(1):51-77. PubMed ID: 247196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Science policy. Highlights from the budget.
Kaiser J; Malakoff D; Stokstad ; Siefe C
Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5659):749. PubMed ID: 14764845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Unified agenda of federal regulatory and deregulatory actions--HHS. Semiannual regulatory agenda.
Fed Regist; 1998 Nov; 63(216 Pt 2):61680-786. PubMed ID: 10187396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Organizational history of HSMHA.
Sims LB
Health Serv Rep; 1973 Feb; 88(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 4358689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. AIDS programs brace for funding cuts; few agencies expect to be spared.
AIDS Alert; 1995 Oct; 10(10):121-2, 124. PubMed ID: 11362781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulatory experience in applying a radiological environmental protection framework for existing and planned nuclear facilities.
Mihok S; Thompson P
Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):256-62. PubMed ID: 23089024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
