These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6978120)

  • 1. Evaluation of various techniques to monitor intragastric pH.
    Meiners D; Clift S; Kaminski D
    Arch Surg; 1982 Mar; 117(3):288-91. PubMed ID: 6978120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A single intragastric pH electrode does not accurately measure intragastric acidity.
    Fisher RS; Sher DJ; Donahue D; Senior J; Krevsky B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8651165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term ambulatory gastric pH monitoring: validation of a new method and effect of H2-antagonists.
    Fimmel CJ; Etienne A; Cilluffo T; von Ritter C; Gasser T; Rey JP; Caradonna-Moscatelli P; Sabbatini F; Pace F; Bühler HW
    Gastroenterology; 1985 Jun; 88(6):1842-51. PubMed ID: 3996841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of intragastric pH in acutely ill patients.
    Herrmann V; Kaminski DL
    Arch Surg; 1979 Apr; 114(4):511-4. PubMed ID: 35135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regional differences in gastric acidity and antacid distribution: is a single pH electrode sufficient?
    Fisher RS; Sher DJ; Donahue D; Knight LC; Maurer A; Urbain JL; Krevsky B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1997 Feb; 92(2):263-70. PubMed ID: 9040203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Continuous intragastric pH-metry].
    Bauerfeind P; Cilluffo T; Fimmel CJ; Gasser T; Köhler W; Merki H; Emde C; Etienne A; Blum AL
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1985 Nov; 115(46):1630-41. PubMed ID: 4081695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intragastric pH in postlaparotomy patients--effects of cimetidine.
    Sakuramoto S; Mieno H; Sakakibara Y; Hiki Y; Saigenji K
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1994 Apr; 41(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 8056397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of a new effervescent cimetidine formulation on gastric acidity in healthy subjects.
    Vlasblom V; Fellinger HW; Breumelhof R; Smout AJ
    Neth J Med; 1991 Apr; 38(3-4):147-52. PubMed ID: 1881502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of gastric acidity in intensive care patients: intermittent pH registration cannot replace continuous pH monitoring.
    Bonten MJ; Gaillard CA; Stockbrügger RW; van Tiel FH; van der Geest S; Stobberingh EE
    Intensive Care Med; 1996 Mar; 22(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 8727435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of antacid, sucralfate, cimetidine, and ranitidine in protection of the gastric mucosa against ethanol injury.
    Tarnawski A; Hollander D; Gergely H; Stachura J
    Am J Med; 1985 Aug; 79(2C):19-23. PubMed ID: 2863980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pre-anesthetic cimetidine and gastric pH.
    Maliniak K; Vakil AH
    Anesth Analg; 1979; 58(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 36817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Analysis of ambulatory 24-hour intragastric pH monitoring--comparison of the effects of cimetidine 200 mg QID and 800 mg UID].
    Hongo M; Ohara S; Asaki S; Goto Y; Sakurada H; Shibuya D; Kimpara T
    Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Mar; 85(3):659-66. PubMed ID: 3385970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions of cimetidine and ranitidine with aluminum-containing antacids and a clay-containing gastric-protective drug in an "artificial stomach-duodenum" model.
    Vatier J; Harman A; Castela N; Droy-Lefaix MT; Farinotti R
    J Pharm Sci; 1994 Jul; 83(7):962-6. PubMed ID: 7965675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antacid regimen in reducing gastric fluid acidity--comparison of conventional oral antacids with cimetidine.
    Channa AB; Seraj MA; Istafan MY; Khan FM
    Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 1985 Jun; 8(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 4046881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new method for measurement of the electrical potential difference across the stomach wall. Clinical evaluation of the gastric mucosal integrity.
    Højgaard L; Andersen JR; Krag E
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1987 Sep; 22(7):847-58. PubMed ID: 3672042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identical 24-hour gastric pH profiles when using intragastric antimony or glass electrodes or aspirated gastric juice.
    Andersen J; Naesdal J; Ström M
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1988 Apr; 23(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 3387903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cimetidine vs antacid in prophylaxis for stress ulceration.
    Weigelt JA; Aurbakken CM; Gewertz BL; Snyder WH
    Arch Surg; 1981 May; 116(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 7016067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison between cimetidine-pirenzepine and antacids for the prevention of stress hemorrhage in intensive care patients. A controlled clinical study on 125 patients].
    Engelhardt D; Karl R; Kolb HJ; Inthorn D; König N; Büll U; Hölzel D
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1985 Jun; 110(23):908-14. PubMed ID: 3888594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Calcium containing antacids and acid rebound. Testing with intragastric titration and extragastric measurement of pH].
    Weingart J; Ottenjann R
    Fortschr Med; 1977 Aug; 95(32):1987-9. PubMed ID: 21129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failure of gastric pH control by antacids or cimetidine in the critically ill: a valid sign of sepsis.
    Martin LF; Max MH; Polk HC
    Surgery; 1980 Jul; 88(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 6966835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.