These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6979600)
1. Decision-making and the right to refuse lifesaving treatment for defective newborns. Shatten DA; Chabon RS J Leg Med; 1982 Mar; 3(1):59-79. PubMed ID: 6979600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective. Ackerman JW; Pope MC J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The law and intensive care. The role of the courts in the ethical decision-making process. Smith DA Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 3454239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis. Crossley MA Med Law; 1987; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria? Longino PH Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Establishing decision making standards for medical treatment to protect the civil rights of handicapped newborns. Glasow SB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():255-74. PubMed ID: 10317803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Baby Doe, Congress and the states: challenging the federal treatment standard for impaired infants. Newman SA Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 2764010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Withholding life-sustaining treatment from severely defective newborns: who should decide? Greenstein LJ Med Law; 1987; 6(6):487-97. PubMed ID: 3312908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical issues in the treatment of critically ill newborns. Fost N Pediatr Ann; 1981 Oct; 10(10):16-22. PubMed ID: 7312441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical and legal issues in the care of the impaired newborn. Moreno JD Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):345-60. PubMed ID: 3595056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe. McFadden JP; Hentoff N Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The case of Mr. Stevens. Cranford RE Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 1938335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention. Riga PJ Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical treatment of defective newborns: an answer to the "Baby Doe" dilemma. Shapiro RS Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(1):137-52. PubMed ID: 11651781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dying at the right time: a critical legal theory approach to timing-of-death issues. Ikuta SS Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(1):3-66. PubMed ID: 2695495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Premature infants: a legal approach to decision-making in neonatal intensive care. Gorski SL Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1985; 19(3-4):261-81. PubMed ID: 11649774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns. Goichman G South Univ Law Rev; 1983; 9(2):157-84. PubMed ID: 11652508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Canadian Charter of Rights and individual choice in treatment. Ferguson G Health Law Can; 1988; 8(3):63-70, 85. PubMed ID: 10312613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life. Wakefield-Fisher M Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]