These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6983123)

  • 1. [Differences in visual evoked responses in man during stimulation of the upper or lower half of the visual field].
    Kuba M
    Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove Suppl; 1981; 24(5):669-79. PubMed ID: 6983123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual evoked responses to reversal stimulation in the upper and lower half of the central part of the visual field in man.
    Kuba M; Peregrin J; Vít F; Hanusová I
    Physiol Bohemoslov; 1982; 31(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 6219406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of the inter-stimulus interval on visual evoked potentials to patterned stimuli.
    Czigler I
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1979 Sep; 21(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 517072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Registration of visual evoked neuromagnetic fields following partial field stimulation of the fovea].
    Blum T; Bauer R; Kubicki S
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1984 Mar; 15(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 6426928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human brain response to visual stimulus between lower/upper visual fields and cerebral hemispheres.
    Lee B; Kaneoke Y; Kakigi R; Sakai Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 19643151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multifocal visual evoked potentials--a method study of responses from small sectors of the visual field.
    Bengtsson M; Andréasson S; Andersson G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 116(8):1975-83. PubMed ID: 15998602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual processing time differences owing to visual field asymmetries.
    Carlsen AN; Maslovat D; Chua R; Franks IM
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(10):1067-70. PubMed ID: 17558298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Visual evoked potentials and homonymous lateral hemianopsia].
    Malbrel C
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1984; 84(6-7):841-2. PubMed ID: 6534625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amplitudes of visually evoked cortical responses due to full-field stimulation and to stimulation with four half-fields.
    Orban D; Müller W
    Ophthalmologica; 1991; 202(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 2057192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs.
    Hasegawa S; Abe H
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Dec; 42(13):3341-8. PubMed ID: 11726643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological correlates of visual consciousness and selective attention.
    Koivisto M; Revonsuo A
    Neuroreport; 2007 May; 18(8):753-6. PubMed ID: 17471060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of stimulation frequency and retinal stimulus location on visual evoked potential topography.
    Skrandies W
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 17587164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-epoch analysis of interleaved evoked potentials and fMRI responses during steady-state visual stimulation.
    Bianciardi M; Bianchi L; Garreffa G; Abbafati M; Di Russo F; Marciani MG; Macaluso E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Apr; 120(4):738-47. PubMed ID: 19250866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Visual evoked responses after stimulation by regular and irregular reversal stimuli (author's transl)].
    Svĕráková H; Cervenková J
    Cesk Oftalmol; 1982 Mar; 38(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 7083356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Slow pattern-reversal stimulation facilitates the assessment of retinal function with multifocal recordings.
    Hoffmann MB; Flechner JJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 119(2):409-17. PubMed ID: 18054278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evoked responses of the retina and brain to structured photic stimulation: basic data].
    Peregrin J; Svĕrák J
    Cesk Oftalmol; 1987 Jul; 43(4):227-36. PubMed ID: 3664679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neuromagnetic evidence that the P100 component of the pattern reversal visual evoked response originates in the bottom of the calcarine fissure.
    Seki K; Nakasato N; Fujita S; Hatanaka K; Kawamura T; Kanno A; Yoshimoto T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 100(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 8893661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [An evaluation of the differences in human evoked cortical potentials to visual stimuli].
    Myshkin IIu; Maĭorov VV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1996; 46(3):488-95. PubMed ID: 8755051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The visually evoked potential in retrochiasmatic lesions of the optic pathways: an attempt to interpret the responses obtained by flash pattern stimulation and the results of the calculation of the correlation coefficient between visually evoked potentials.
    Samson-Dollfus D; Parain D; Weber J; Menard JF; Mihout B; Vachon B
    Adv Neurol; 1982; 32():71-80. PubMed ID: 7054988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual evoked magnetic responses to central and peripheral stimulation: simultaneous VEP recordings.
    Brecelj J; Kakigi R; Koyama S; Hoshiyama M
    Brain Topogr; 1998; 10(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 9562544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.