These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Efficacy of prone positioning for intravenous digital angiography of the abdomen. Seigel RS; Williams AG Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):295. PubMed ID: 6856850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital radiography of the chest: clinical experience with a prototype unit. Fraser RG; Breatnach E; Barnes GT Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 6856816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital radiography of the chest: design features and considerations for a prototype unit. Tesic MM; Mattson RA; Barnes GT; Sones RA; Stickney JB Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):259-64. PubMed ID: 6856847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Sonoda M; Takano M; Miyahara J; Kato H Radiology; 1983 Sep; 148(3):833-8. PubMed ID: 6878707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-detail-dose and dose efficiency analysis of a scanning digital and a screen-film-grid radiographic system. Cohen G; Wagner LK; Amtey SR; Di Bianca FA Med Phys; 1981; 8(3):358-67. PubMed ID: 7322059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital angiography: current status. Robillard P; Roy P; Galand C; Sylvestre J J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Jun; 34(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 6350311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study. Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of diagnostic digital radiography of the chest in comparison with conventional chest x-ray films]. Eguchi K; Anan M; Yamada T; Ikeda S Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Dec; 21(12):1139-45. PubMed ID: 6676527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Intravenous contrast bolus in computed tomography investigation of mass lesion. Love L; Malone A; Churchill R; Reynes C; Moncada R; Demos T; Salinas M Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1984; 53(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 6561119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Roentgen pictures in the digital image]. Buchmann F; Balter S Computertomographie; 1981 Jun; 1(2):47-51. PubMed ID: 6764887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A scanning system for chest radiography with regional exposure control: practical implementation. Plewes DB; Vogelstein E Med Phys; 1983; 10(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 6646071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noise analysis of a digital radiography system. Arnold BA; Scheibe PO AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):609-13. PubMed ID: 6364749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study. Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A scanning system for chest radiography with regional exposure control: theoretical considerations. Plewes DB Med Phys; 1983; 10(5):646-54. PubMed ID: 6646070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]