These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6985742)

  • 21. [Iodoxanic acid, a new oral cholecystographic contrast medium: comparison with iodopanoic acid].
    Orlandini I
    Radiol Med; 1970 Sep; 56(9):832-5. PubMed ID: 5210611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A clinical trial of oral cholecystography using combinations of contrast agents and two consecutive doses.
    Thoeni RF; Moss AA
    Radiology; 1982 Jul; 144(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 7045975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical comparison of locetamic acid (cholebrine) and ipodate sodium (Orgrafin).
    Neal RR; Harvey KG; Cantwell KG; Press HC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1979 May; 132(5):735-6. PubMed ID: 155391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of nonfractionated and fractionated administration of iopanoic acid on gallbladder visualization.
    Nehen AM; Kruse V
    Radiology; 1978 Sep; 128(3):605-7. PubMed ID: 674624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of iocetamic acid and sodium iopodate in cholecystography.
    Golberg B
    Radiol Clin (Basel); 1977; 46(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 136669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The combined use of oral cholecystopaque media and iodipamide.
    Goergen T; Goldberger LE; Berk RN
    Radiology; 1974 Jun; 111(3):543-8. PubMed ID: 4828985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acute thrombocytopenia following oral cholecystography with iopanoic acid.
    Curradi F; Abbritti G; Agnelli G
    Clin Toxicol; 1981 Feb; 18(2):221-4. PubMed ID: 7226734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Subjective vs. objective evaluation of gallbladder opacification during oral cholecystography in comparative clinical trials: implications for studies involving visual assessment.
    Fon GT; Hunter TB; Berk RN; Patton DD; Capp MP
    Radiology; 1982 Jul; 144(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 7089280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hepatic excretion of cholecystopaques introduced into the canine jejunum.
    Menuck L; Amberg JR; Bates M
    Invest Radiol; 1977; 12(1):106-8. PubMed ID: 138663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fractionated dose cholecystography: a comparison between iopanoic acid and sodium ipodate.
    Reiner RG; Lawson MJ; Davies GT; Tucker WG; Mileski O; Read TR; Grant AK
    Clin Radiol; 1980 Nov; 31(6):667-9. PubMed ID: 7214807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiopaque contrast media. XXXVII-Iopronic acid, a new contrast medium for oral cholecystography: pharmacologic investigation.
    Tirone P; Rosati G
    Farmaco Prat; 1976 Aug; 31(8):397-412. PubMed ID: 955053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Renal toxicity of radiological contrast media.
    Grainger RG
    Br Med Bull; 1972 Sep; 28(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 4569777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Oral cholecystography in the early phase of acute alcoholic pancreatitis. A prospective, randomized comparison of Telepaque and Bilopaque.
    Smith HJ; Corbett DB; Loeb PM; Peterson WL
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 6759457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. RENAL TOXICITY OF ORAL CHOLECYSTOGRAPHIC MEDIA. BUNAMIODYL SODIUM AND IOPANOIC ACID.
    WENNBERG JE; OKUN R; HINMAN EJ; NORTHCUTT RC; GRIEP RJ; WALKER WG
    JAMA; 1963 Nov; 186():461-7. PubMed ID: 14085024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiopaque contrast media. XXXVIII - Iopronic acid, a new contrast medium for oral cholecystography: toxicologic investigation.
    Tirone P; Rosati G
    Farmaco Prat; 1976 Sep; 31(9):437-46. PubMed ID: 1010018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Residual contrast medium in the intestines and side effects during cholecystography. A comparison between some contrast media in current use and a new medium.
    Eriksson S; Saltzman GF
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1970 Jan; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 5447107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative trial of two oral cholecystographic contrast media--iocetamic acid (Cholebrin) and iopanoic acid (Telepaque).
    Fielding JA; Whitehouse GH
    Clin Radiol; 1979 Jan; 30(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 154372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Double blind clinical comparison of two oral cholecystographic contrast media.
    Perez CA; Friedenberg MJ
    Mo Med; 1966 Jan; 63(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 5329730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. TYROPANOATE SODIUM. A NEW ORAL CHOLECYSTOGRAPHIC MEDIUM.
    DAVIS JJ
    Rocky Mt Med J; 1964 Apr; 61():35-9. PubMed ID: 14137928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparative study with a closed sequential design between iopronic and iocetamic acid in oral cholecystocholangiography with radiograms in short and standard times. Laboratory evaluation of hepatic function (author's transl)].
    Lutman M; Morassut S; Bigai M; Galassi G; Galofaro G; Piazza P
    Radiol Med; 1980; 66(7-8):517-22. PubMed ID: 6452657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.