These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6986068)
1. Evaluation of Uricult dip slide in two hospital populations. Winn WC; Gillenwater JY Urology; 1980 Jan; 15(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 6986068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dip-slide in patients at high risk of urinary tract infection. Bonadio M Urol Int; 1980; 35(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 6987796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The dip-slide in urology. Jackaman FR; Darrell JH; Shackman R Br Med J; 1973 Jan; 1(5847):207-8. PubMed ID: 4568662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a dip-slide in a university outpatient service. Martin MJ; Mcguckin MB J Urol; 1978 Aug; 120(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 671633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Appraisal of the Uricult dip-slide method in the diagnosis of urinary infections. Bailey MJ; Notelovitz M S Afr Med J; 1973 Jul; 47(26):1135. PubMed ID: 4577797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of bacteriuria by dip-slide. Routine use in a large general hospital. Ellner PD; Papachristos T Am J Clin Pathol; 1975 Apr; 63(4):516-21. PubMed ID: 1091136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective evaluation of a semiquantitative dip slide method compared with quantitative bacterial cultures of BAL fluid. Speich R; Wüst J; Hess T; Kayser FH; Russi EW Chest; 1996 Jun; 109(6):1423-9. PubMed ID: 8769488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Bacteriuria screening: comparison of the results obtained with dip-slide and other methods (author's transl)]. Giganti E; Lamanna S Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1980 Sep; 16(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 7017799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis of urinary tract infection. The interpretation of colony counts. Slosky DA; Todd JK Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1977 Aug; 16(8):698-701. PubMed ID: 326458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of laboratory methods in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Duerden BI; Moyes A J Clin Pathol; 1976 Apr; 29(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 777041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative determination of the number of bacteria in urine by dip-slide method. Nabbut NH; Hakim A J Med Liban; 1973; 26(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 4577886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Cult-Dip Plus dip slide method for urinary tract infection. Blondeau JM; Yaschuk Y; Galenzoski D; Hrabok D; Isaacson M; Lee L; Link H; Walshaw L J Clin Pathol; 1995 Aug; 48(8):710-3. PubMed ID: 7560194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recognition of group B streptococci in dip-slide cultures of urine. Jokipii AM; Jokipii L J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 389949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnosis of urinary tract infections in general practice. A comparative study of Microstix and Uricult]. Kjaerulff E; Dybkjaer L; Granlie K; Magnusson B Ugeskr Laeger; 1979 May; 141(22):1477-80. PubMed ID: 377744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Difficulties for primary health care staff in interpreting bacterial findings on a device for simplified urinary culture. Palmqvist E; Aspevall O; Burman E; Nordin G; Svahn A; Forsum U Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2008; 68(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 18609088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]