These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6988030)
21. Randomised, controlled pilot to compare collagen and foam in stagnating pressure ulcers. Piatkowski A; Ulrich D; Seidel D; Abel M; Pallua N; Andriessen A J Wound Care; 2012 Oct; 21(10):505-11. PubMed ID: 23103485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Silastic foam dressing compared with mèche-treatment in open management following excision of a pilonidal cyst]. Eldrup J Ugeskr Laeger; 1985 Jan; 147(5):408-9. PubMed ID: 3883609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing (intervention) vs silver sulfadiazine cream. Silverstein P; Heimbach D; Meites H; Latenser B; Mozingo D; Mullins F; Garner W; Turkowski J; Shupp J; Glat P; Purdue G J Burn Care Res; 2011; 32(6):617-26. PubMed ID: 21979855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A polythene pack for perineal wounds. Leahy AL; Peel AL Br J Surg; 1984 Apr; 71(4):277. PubMed ID: 6704678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Improved management of the perineal wound after proctectomy. Tompkins RG; Warshaw AL Ann Surg; 1985 Dec; 202(6):760-5. PubMed ID: 4073988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Management of the perineal wounds following excision of the rectum for malignancy. Wang JY; Huang CJ; Hsieh JS; Huang YS; Juang YF; Huang TJ Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi; 1994 Apr; 10(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 8007046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A study of perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection. Saha SK; Robinson AF Br J Surg; 1976 Jul; 63(7):555-8. PubMed ID: 953451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Negative pressure wound therapy-associated tissue trauma and pain: a controlled in vivo study comparing foam and gauze dressing removal by immunohistochemistry for substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in the wound edge. Malmsjö M; Gustafsson L; Lindstedt S; Ingemansson R Ostomy Wound Manage; 2011 Dec; 57(12):30-5. PubMed ID: 22156176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Managing burn wounds with SMARTPORE Technology polyurethane foam: two case reports. Imran FH; Karim R; Maat NH J Med Case Rep; 2016 May; 10(1):120. PubMed ID: 27170287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting. Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Foam elastomer dressing: a liquid alternative to gauze. Macfie J; Cowell M; Pawsey G; Bancroft J; McMahon M Nurs Mirror; 1979 Aug; 149(5):30-2. PubMed ID: 257606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Problems in perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum per primam]. Horák L; Kabát J; Votocek J; Berger T Rozhl Chir; 1991 Mar; 70(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 1896901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Healing of the sacral wound cavity after abdomino-perineal extirpation of the rectum. A prospective randomized study using metronidazole]. Wacha H; Probst M Chirurg; 1984 Jan; 55(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 6370623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Healing rate of hospital-acquired skin tears using adhesive silicone foam versus meshed silicone interface dressings: A prospective, randomized, non-inferiority pilot study. Fulbrook P; Miles SJ; Williams DM Int J Nurs Pract; 2024 Jun; 30(3):e13229. PubMed ID: 38123157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Wound management using a silicone foam dressing. Results of a multicenter study]. Linke E; Kloss HP; Jung W Fortschr Med; 1986 Dec; 104(47-48):979-82. PubMed ID: 3546040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Management of the perineal wounds after abdominoperineal resection: simple drainage only or with continuous irrigation?]. Xiao Y; Zhang GN; Wu B; Lin GL; Wu WM; Xu L; Qiu HZ Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 48(14):1088-91. PubMed ID: 21055113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multicentre prospective trial of Silastic foam dressing in management of open granulating wounds. Williams RH; Wood RA; Mason MC; Edwards M; Goodall P Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Jan; 282(6257):21-2. PubMed ID: 6778552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Systematic review of dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. Vermeulen H; Ubbink DT; Goossens A; de Vos R; Legemate DA Br J Surg; 2005 Jun; 92(6):665-72. PubMed ID: 15912490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers. Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]