These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6988158)

  • 1. A plea for common standards in computer aided ECG analysis.
    Willems JL
    Comput Biomed Res; 1980 Apr; 13(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 6988158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. V. Suggested standards for instrumentation in computer processing of electrocardiograms.
    Sherwood JD
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1259-61. PubMed ID: 4574249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Common standards for quantitative electrocardiography: goals and main results. CSE Working Party.
    Willems JL; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Degani R; Macfarlane PW; Zywietz C
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 2233372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. IV. Suggested minimal performance requirements and methods of performance evaluation for computer ECG analysis programs.
    Helppi RR; Unite V; Wolf HK
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1251-9. PubMed ID: 4574248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. II. Some considerations relevant to the selection of ECG Program.
    Milliken JA
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May; 108(10):1232-8. PubMed ID: 4574246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Letter: Evaluating computer ECG programs.
    Pipberger HV; Cornfield J
    Circulation; 1974 Dec; 50(6):1287-8. PubMed ID: 4279148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. European Conformance Testing Services for computerized electrocardiography. New procedures and standards.
    Zywietz C; Willems JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1993; 26 Suppl():137-46. PubMed ID: 8189115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference standards for software evaluation.
    Michaelis J; Wellek S; Willems JL
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 2233375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A comparative investigation of the clinical value of an ECG-computer analysis (author's transl)].
    Enenkel W; Spiel R; Kiss E
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Oct; 86(18):523-7. PubMed ID: 4277767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The status of the standards.
    Gettes LS
    J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(2):213-4. PubMed ID: 19167720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of a 15-lead hybrid computer-aided electrocardiographic system.
    Talbot S; Dreifus LS; Watanabe Y; Reich M; Chiang R; Morris K
    Eur J Cardiol; 1973 Sep; 1(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 4618198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Updating electrocardiography standards.
    Gettes LS
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Apr; 40(2):117-8. PubMed ID: 17349456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [ECG interpretation by computer. How reliable is rhythm diagnosis?].
    Rosendahl L; Pahlm O
    Lakartidningen; 1994 May; 91(21):2140-2. PubMed ID: 8052000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Usefulness of multicenter evaluation of the reliability of a program for automatic analysis in clinical electrocardiography].
    Feruglio GA; Liverani M; Sicca GT; Zecchi P; Bigalli A; Feraco E; Loperfido F; Marchei M; Mirolo R; Puccini E
    Minerva Med; 1980 Nov; 71(45):3289-96. PubMed ID: 7010212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative evaluations between on-line and off-line in automatic electrocardiographic diagnosis and readings of the cardiologist].
    Bigalli A; Ciuti M; Davini P; Puccini E; Sicca GT
    Minerva Med; 1980 Nov; 71(45):3297-300. PubMed ID: 7010213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Accuracy in computer diagnosis of electrocardiogram].
    Atarashi H
    Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi; 1993 Feb; 60(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 8429095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer error and acceptable standards for electrocardiographic interpretation.
    Spodick DH
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):348-9. PubMed ID: 16697395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can the lessons learned from the assessment of automated electrocardiogram analysis in the Common Standards for quantitative Electrocardiography study benefit measurement of delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images?
    Fayn J; Rubel P; Macfarlane PW
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 17478178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Editorial: Accuracy of data reduction systems for diagnosis and quantification of arrhythmias.
    Corday E; Lang TW
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jun; 35(6):927-8. PubMed ID: 1093377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the normal values for signal-averaged electrocardiogram.
    Marcus FI; Zareba W; Sherrill D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 17338774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.