These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6988463)

  • 1. A comparison of the sensitivity of immunofluorescence and Giemsa for staining Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells.
    Munday PE; Johnson AP; Thomas BJ; Taylor-Robinson D
    J Clin Pathol; 1980 Feb; 33(2):177-9. PubMed ID: 6988463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Giemsa and fluorescent monoclonal antibody staining of inoculated cell cultures for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Chan SW; Cunningham AL
    Pathology; 1994 Apr; 26(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 8090593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Prostato-urethritis due to chlamydia].
    Grossgebauer K; Nürnberger F
    Z Hautkr; 1982 Jun; 57(11):790-802. PubMed ID: 7048774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early detection of chlamydial inclusions combining the use of cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells and immunofluorescence staining.
    Thomas BJ; Evans RT; Hutchinson GR; Taylor-Robinson D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Sep; 6(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 71306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in smears by use of a fluorescein labelled monoclonal antibody: comparison with conventional chlamydial isolation.
    Thomas BJ; Evans RT; Hawkins DA; Taylor-Robinson D
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Jul; 37(7):812-6. PubMed ID: 6205023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of HeLa 229 and McCoy cell cultures for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.
    Thewessen EA; Freundt I; van Rijsoort-Vos JH; Stolz E; Michel MF; Wagenvoort JH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Jun; 27(6):1399-400. PubMed ID: 2754009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative evaluation of various direct and culture methods for the diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections].
    Martelli P; Crovatto M; Gava G; Chiaradia V; Santini G
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1986 Mar; 22(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 3538126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in McCoy and HeLa-229 cells: an alternative staining technique using toluidine blue.
    Mohammed NR; Hillary IB
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Jun; 37(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 6202722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of mitomycin-C treated McCoy cells for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from genital specimens.
    Woodland RM; Kirton RP; Darougar S
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Dec; 6(6):653-6. PubMed ID: 3126059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from patients of southeastern venereal disease clinic.
    Bradley BS; Fisher LM; Dalton HP
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Jun; 73(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 6893105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Non-gonococcal urethritis and cervicitis. Isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis and detection of anti-Chlamydia antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence].
    Scieux C; Colimon R; Mazeron MC; Ronco E; Cahuzac P; Pérol Y
    Presse Med; 1983 Jun; 12(24):1523-6. PubMed ID: 6222356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Chlamydia trachomatis: detection using a direct test and culture in 100 genital specimens].
    Dutilh B; Bebear C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1985; 43(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 3896054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of various McCoy cell treatment procedures used for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Evans RT; Taylor-Robinson D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 389948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the in-vitro activity of antimicrobials against Chlamydia trachomatis examined by Giemsa and a fluorescent antibody stain.
    How SJ; Hobson D; Hart CA; Quayle E
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1985 Apr; 15(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 3891709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of various cell culture procedures for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and applicability to diagnosis of pediatric infections.
    La Scolea LJ; Keddell JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Apr; 13(4):705-8. PubMed ID: 7014620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of buffalo green monkey cells and McCoy cells for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis in a microtiter system.
    Krech T; Bleckmann M; Paatz R
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 27(10):2364-5. PubMed ID: 2685032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from urethral scrapings of men.
    Sádecký E; Miklásová J; Zambor M; Urvölgyi J; Kovácová E; Brezina R
    Acta Microbiol Hung; 1984; 31(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 6380196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in routine clinical practice: increased sensitivity of cell culture in comparison with the microimmunofluorescence test].
    Sterzik K; Rosenbusch B; Danner B; Heeg KM; Wolf A; Lauritzen C
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Dec; 48(12):881-3. PubMed ID: 3069566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis-negative non-gonococcal urethritis.
    O'Mahony C
    Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Apr; 16(4):330-1. PubMed ID: 15899091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Chlamydia trachomatis: comparative study of isolation with cell culture and direct examination, in the diagnosis of male urethritis].
    Belda W; Mendes CM; Carvalho RP; Siqueira LF; Francisco W; dos Santos Júnior MF
    Rev Paul Med; 1985; 103(4):199-201. PubMed ID: 3914049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.