These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6989230)

  • 1. Susceptibility testing with anaerobic blood culture isolates. Comparison of a rapid, direct methods with standardized method.
    Murray PR; Christman JL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Apr; 73(4):558-61. PubMed ID: 6989230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of direct and standardized antibiotic susceptibility testing in bacteriuria.
    Källenius G; Dornbusch K; Hallander HO; Jakobsson K
    Chemotherapy; 1981; 27(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 7471907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Washington JA
    Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1979; (19):13-6. PubMed ID: 288163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial mixtures using agar dilution technique.
    Athar MA
    Am J Med Technol; 1980 Feb; 46(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 6986770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a direct blood culture disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility test.
    Doern GV; Scott DR; Rashad AL; Kim KS
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Nov; 20(5):696-8. PubMed ID: 7325634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of direct and standard microtiter broth dilution susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates.
    Kiehn TE; Capitolo C; Armstrong D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jul; 16(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 7107862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic organisms using the agar dilution method: comparison of three techniques.
    Wexler HM; Reeves D; Finegold SM
    Clin Ther; 1988; 10(6):747-60. PubMed ID: 3219688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of direct Etest for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria isolated from synovial fluid of horses using enrichment bottles.
    Dumoulin M; Martens A; Van den Abeele AM; Boyen F; Oosterlinck M; Wilderjans H; Gasthuys F; Haesebrouck F; Pille F
    Vet J; 2017 Feb; 220():55-62. PubMed ID: 28190496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antimicrobial resistance and susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Schuetz AN
    Clin Infect Dis; 2014 Sep; 59(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 24867792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new rapid method for direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from positive blood cultures.
    Barnini S; Brucculeri V; Morici P; Ghelardi E; Florio W; Lupetti A
    BMC Microbiol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):185. PubMed ID: 27520338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Sutter VL
    Am J Med Technol; 1976 Apr; 42(4):111-4. PubMed ID: 1266883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-positive and -negative bacterial isolates directly from spiked blood culture media with Raman spectroscopy.
    Dekter HE; Orelio CC; Morsink MC; Tektas S; Vis B; Te Witt R; van Leeuwen WB
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2017 Jan; 36(1):81-89. PubMed ID: 27638006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Techniques for anaerobic susceptibility testing.
    Thornsberry C
    J Infect Dis; 1977 Mar; 135 Suppl():S4-6. PubMed ID: 850089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing from blood culture bottles with species agnostic real-time polymerase chain reaction.
    Maxson T; Blancett CD; Graham AS; Stefan CP; Minogue TD
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209042. PubMed ID: 30543695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid, direct antibiotic susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates using the Abbott Avantage system.
    Nolte FS; Contestable PB; Lincalis D; Punsalang A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Nov; 86(5):665-9. PubMed ID: 3096131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Susceptibility testing revisited.
    Stratton CW
    Prog Clin Pathol; 1984; 9():65-100. PubMed ID: 6364225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Clostridium difficile minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained using agar dilution vs broth microdilution methods.
    Hastey CJ; Dale SE; Nary J; Citron D; Law JH; Roe-Carpenter DE; Chesnel L
    Anaerobe; 2017 Apr; 44():73-77. PubMed ID: 28188880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Merlin MICRONAUT system for rapid direct susceptibility testing of gram-positive cocci and gram-negative bacilli from positive blood cultures.
    Wellinghausen N; Pietzcker T; Poppert S; Belak S; Fieser N; Bartel M; Essig A
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 45(3):789-95. PubMed ID: 17202283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multilaboratory comparison of anaerobe susceptibility results using 3 different agar media.
    Roe DE; Finegold SM; Citron DM; Goldstein EJ; Wexler HM; Rosenblatt JE; Cox ME; Jenkins SG; Hecht DW
    Clin Infect Dis; 2002 Sep; 35(Suppl 1):S40-6. PubMed ID: 12173107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Performance evaluation of VITEK 2 system in meropenem susceptibility testing of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates].
    Acuner IC; Bayramoğlu G; Birinci A; Cekiç Cihan C; Bek Y; Durupınar B
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jul; 45(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 21935774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.