These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6989230)

  • 41. A comparison of Sensititre™ Anaerobe MIC plate with ATB ANA® test for the routine susceptibility testing of common anaerobe pathogens.
    Cherkaoui A; Fischer A; Azam N; Riat A; Schrenzel J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 Dec; 37(12):2279-2284. PubMed ID: 30191340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Final report from the Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Japanese Society of Chemotherapy, on the agar dilution method (2007).
    Nagayama A; Yamaguchi K; Watanabe K; Tanaka M; Kobayashi I; Nagasawa Z
    J Infect Chemother; 2008 Oct; 14(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 18936894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparative evaluation of agar dilution and broth microdilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Helicobacter cinaedi.
    Tomida J; Oumi A; Okamoto T; Morita Y; Okayama A; Misawa N; Hayashi T; Akaike T; Kawamura Y
    Microbiol Immunol; 2013 May; 57(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 23668607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. E-test: a new technique for antimicrobial susceptibility testing for periodontal microorganisms.
    Nachnani S; Scuteri A; Newman MG; Avanessian AB; Lomeli SL
    J Periodontol; 1992 Jul; 63(7):576-83. PubMed ID: 1324301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Rapid identification and susceptibility testing using the VITEK 2 system using culture fluids from positive BacT/ALERT blood cultures.
    Chen JR; Lee SY; Yang BH; Lu JJ
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2008 Jun; 41(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 18629422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria in a University Hospital Centre Split, Croatia in 2013.
    Novak A; Rubic Z; Dogas V; Goic-Barisic I; Radic M; Tonkic M
    Anaerobe; 2015 Feb; 31():31-6. PubMed ID: 25479237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria isolated from animals: methods for in-vitro susceptibility testing and their suitability with regard to the generation of the most useful data for therapeutic applications].
    Schwarz S; Böttner A; Hafez HM; Kehrenberg C; Kietzmann M; Klarmann D; Klein G; Krabisch P; Kühn T; Luhofer G; Richter A; Traeder W; Waldmann KH; Wallmann J; Werckenthin C
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003; 116(9-10):353-61. PubMed ID: 14526464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of three standardized disc susceptibility testing methods for colistin.
    Tan TY; Ng LS
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2006 Oct; 58(4):864-7. PubMed ID: 16905528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Same-Day Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria in Positive Blood Culture Broths Using Short-Term Incubation on Solid Medium with the MicroFlex LT, Vitek-MS, and Vitek2 Systems.
    Ha J; Hong SK; Han GH; Kim M; Yong D; Lee K
    Ann Lab Med; 2018 May; 38(3):235-241. PubMed ID: 29401558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of incubation conditions on anaerobic susceptibility testing results.
    Murray PR; Niles AC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Dec; 16(6):1152-4. PubMed ID: 7161379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by flow cytometry.
    Pore RS
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1994 Nov; 34(5):613-27. PubMed ID: 7706157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Antibiotic susceptibility testing.
    White FP
    Pediatr Infect Dis; 1986; 5(2):278-9. PubMed ID: 3952020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of discs and tablets for antibiotic sensitivity testing [proceedings].
    Fabius GT; van Gestel M; Mouton RP
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 1978; 44(3-4):459-60. PubMed ID: 582249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Slow March toward Rapid Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Are We There Yet?
    Doern CD
    J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Apr; 56(4):. PubMed ID: 29436417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Inoculum preparation for anaerobic susceptibility tests.
    Murray PR; Niles AC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):733-4. PubMed ID: 6630450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by two methods of inoculum preparation.
    Bourgault AM; Lamothe F
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1060-4. PubMed ID: 6520217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of broth microdilution susceptibility results for anaerobic organisms by use of a rapid direct colony inoculum.
    Mangels JI; Lindberg LH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Feb; 21(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 3972999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Susceptibility testing with anaerobic blood culture isolates. Comparison of a rapid, direct methods with standardized method.
    Murray PR; Christman JL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Apr; 73(4):558-61. PubMed ID: 6989230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of direct and standardized antibiotic susceptibility testing in bacteriuria.
    Källenius G; Dornbusch K; Hallander HO; Jakobsson K
    Chemotherapy; 1981; 27(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 7471907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. In vitro susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Washington JA
    Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1979; (19):13-6. PubMed ID: 288163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.