These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6989232)

  • 1. Evaluation of a multitest system for rapid identification of Salmonella and Shigella.
    Gooch WM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Apr; 73(4):570-3. PubMed ID: 6989232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of micro-ID with API 20E for identification of Salmonella, Shigella and Yersinia species.
    Ekwall E; Dimander M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jun; 1(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 6756906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A single-tube screen for Salmonella and Shigella.
    Procop GW; Wallace JD; Tuohy MJ; Lasalvia MM; Addison RM; Reller LB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Aug; 130(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 18628099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid method for detection, identification, and susceptibility testing of enteric pathogens.
    Stager CE; Erikson E; Davis JR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jan; 17(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 6338037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a rapid method to exclude the presence of certain enteric pathogens in stool specimens.
    Teti G; Burdash NM; Zamboni C; Fava C; Tomasello F; Mastroeni P
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1049-52. PubMed ID: 6394610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media.
    Barry AL; Badal RE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Sep; 10(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 385617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid automated method for screening of enteric pathogens from stool specimens.
    Villasante PA; Agulla A; Merino FJ; Pérez T; Ladrón de Guevara C; Velasco AC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Mar; 25(3):584-5. PubMed ID: 3553230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multitest system for biochemical identification of Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and other Enterobacteriaceae isolated from foods: collaborative study.
    Keelan SL; Flowers RS; Robison BJ
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1988; 71(5):968-72. PubMed ID: 3069833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Urea-motility-indole medium for recognition and differentiation of Salmonella and Shigella species in stool cultures.
    Rosa Fraile M; Vega Aleman D; Fernandez Gutierrez C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Sep; 12(3):310-3. PubMed ID: 7217332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the ability of four ESBL-screening media to detect ESBL-producing Salmonella and Shigella.
    Sturød K; Dahle UR; Berg ES; Steinbakk M; Wester AL
    BMC Microbiol; 2014 Sep; 14():217. PubMed ID: 25204319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased efficiency of stool culture for the detection of Salmonella and Shigella.
    Fedorko DP; Lehman SM; Yu PK; Germer JJ; Anhalt JP
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989; 12(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 2625035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of enteric media in the primary isolation of Salmonella and Shigella.
    Pollock HM; Dahlgren BJ
    Appl Microbiol; 1974 Jan; 27(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 4589129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid biochemical screening for Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, and Aeromonas isolates from stool specimens.
    De Ryck R; Struelens MJ; Serruys E
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Jun; 32(6):1583-5. PubMed ID: 8077408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a new screening system for enteric pathogens.
    Hinrichs J; Gauthier A; Keating M; Murray P
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1985 Sep; 3(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 3928238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An economic and rapid diagnostic procedure for the detection of salmonella/shigella using the polyvalent salmonella phage O-1.
    Fey H; Bürgi E; Margadant A; Boller E
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1978 Jan; 240(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 636706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Vitek EPS enteric pathogen screen card for detecting Salmonella, Shigella, and Yersinia spp.
    Imperatrice CA; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):433-5. PubMed ID: 8432832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Xylose lysine deoxycholate agar for the isolation of Salmonella and Shigella from clinical specimens.
    Zajc-Satler J; Gragas AZ
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1977; 237(2-3):196-200. PubMed ID: 848209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of three new culture media: brilliant-glycerol-lactose novobiocin-green agar, modified iron lysin agar and Rambach agar for the isolation of enteropathogenic E. coli, Salmonella sp. in acute gastroenteritis].
    Mattar S; Centella A; Daza C; García J
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1994 Dec; 12(10):484-9. PubMed ID: 7865555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two methods for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Appelbaum PC; Arthur RR; Parker ME; Shugar GL; Von Kuster LC; Charache P
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Sep; 78(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 7051807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of two rapid methods to screen pathogens from stool specimens.
    Geers TA; Backes BA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1989 Mar; 91(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 2646912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.